Teams

All the Singles Ladies 3.0W Singles

2023 Howard Columbia Singles · Howard Columbia Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-10-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Jennifer Lippy6-3, 6-2
2023-10-21Won 10
W#2 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-16vs String Theory 3.0W SinglesWon 10
W#3 SinglesChrissy Adair vs Gauri Turner6-3, 6-1
2023-10-11vs NetSuccess 3.0W SinglesWon 20
W#2 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Trina Culbreath6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesChrissy Adair vs Romina Averza6-1, 6-0
2023-10-08Won 10
W#3 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-04vs Racq Pack 3.0W SinglesWon 20
W#2 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Rebekah Noven6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLorra Baker vs Andrea Smolen6-1, 6-4
2023-10-01vs String Theory 3.0W SinglesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Colleen Quinlan4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesCecilia-Hien Phan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-14vs NetSuccess 3.0W SinglesWon 10
W#3 SinglesChrissy Adair vs Trina Culbreath6-3, 6-1
2023-09-11vs I'm a Singles Lady 3.0WWon 20
W#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Tannan Hagyard6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLorra Baker vs Sophia Crawley6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Eloise Grose
published 4
3.69
Jean Acuna
published
3.43
Chrissy Adair
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Amy Flynn
published 3.5
3.07
Reoni Mapp
published
3.04
Keyonna Baker
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3
2.74
Lorra Baker
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.59
Cecilia-Hien Phan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keyonna Baker + Cecilia-Hien Phan5153% gamesnot enough data
Lorra Baker + Cecilia-Hien Phan1451% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eloise Grose
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
Jean Acuna
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Chrissy Adair
115W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Amy Flynn
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Reoni Mapp
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Keyonna Baker
165W–125L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Lorra Baker
102W–161L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Cecilia-Hien Phan
140W–186L career · 1 line in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.