Teams

String Theory 3.0W Singles

2023 Howard Columbia Singles · Howard Columbia Singles 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.29 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-10-22vs NetSuccess 3.0W SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesBecky Ronayne vs Candace Tomczak7-6, 6-0
W#2 SinglesColleen Quinlan vs Anne McKissick6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesColleen Quinlan vs Jean Acuna2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Lynne Walsh vs Eloise Grose1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesGauri Turner vs Chrissy Adair3-6, 1-6
2023-10-11vs I'm a Singles Lady 3.0WLost 01
L#2 SinglesSarah Lynne Walsh vs Tannan Hagyard1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-10-08Won 20
W#1 SinglesBecky Ronayne vs Amy Cohen6-7, 5-2
W#3 SinglesColleen Quinlan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-04vs Miss-Hits 3.0W SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesColleen Quinlan vs Maria Roselle Baltazar4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesSarah Lynne Walsh vs Tetiana Vagizova3-6, 3-6
2023-10-03vs NetSuccess 3.0W SinglesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesColleen Quinlan vs Michelle Bailey-Hedgepeth4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesSarah Lynne Walsh vs Romina Averza7-6, 2-3
2023-10-01vs All the Singles Ladies 3.0W SinglesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesColleen Quinlan vs Keyonna Baker6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesBecky Ronayne vs Reoni Mapp4-6, 3-6
2023-09-15vs I'm a Singles Lady 3.0WLost 12
W#1 SinglesColleen Quinlan vs Hannah Arnold Smith6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesGauri Turner vs Karen Spano4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesSarah Lynne Walsh vs Lindsay Preissler6-7, 4-6
2023-09-09vs Racq Pack 3.0W SinglesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesColleen Quinlan vs Delaney Burkart6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBecky Ronayne vs Rebekah Noven6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Diana Talesnick
published 4
3.33
Becky Ronayne
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Tayloir Thompson
published
3.16
Colleen Quinlan
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.09
Laura Lewandowski
published
2.89
Sarah Lynne Walsh
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.83
Gauri Turner
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.69
Bruni Stephens
published 3
2.62
Arianne Monroe
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Talesnick
90W–34L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Becky Ronayne
100W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.33
Tayloir Thompson
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Colleen Quinlan
118W–96L career · 8 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
Laura Lewandowski
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.09
3
Sarah Lynne Walsh
50W–59L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Gauri Turner
24W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Bruni Stephens
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Arianne Monroe
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.