← Teams

I'm a Singles Lady 3.0W

2023 Howard Columbia Singles · Howard Columbia Singles 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.21 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-10-27vs NetSuccess 3.0W SinglesWon 1–0
W#1 SinglesSusanne Gibbons vs Anne McKissick6-0, 6-4
2023-10-22Lost 0–1
L#2 SinglesTannan Hagyard vs Jennifer Lippy0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-10-21vs Racq Pack 3.0W SinglesLost 0–2
L#2 SinglesKaren Spano vs Delaney Burkart3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesSusanne Gibbons vs Grace Tran4-6, 3-6
2023-10-16vs Miss-Hits 3.0W SinglesLost 0–2
L#1 SinglesKaren Spano vs Shrijoyee Ray1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesTannan Hagyard vs Allison Schiefer4-6, 0-6
2023-10-11vs String Theory 3.0W SinglesWon 1–0
W#2 SinglesTannan Hagyard vs Sarah Lynne Walsh6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2023-10-04vs NetSuccess 3.0W SinglesSplit 1–1
L#2 SinglesLindsay Preissler vs Candace Tomczak2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesSusanne Gibbons vs Amanda Sztein6-1, 6-2
2023-10-01vs Miss-Hits 3.0W SinglesLost 0–2
L#2 SinglesSusanne Gibbons vs Jianmei Zhu3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesTannan Hagyard vs Allison Schiefer2-6, 2-6
2023-09-15vs String Theory 3.0W SinglesWon 2–1
L#1 SinglesHannah Arnold Smith vs Colleen Quinlan4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKaren Spano vs Gauri Turner6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesLindsay Preissler vs Sarah Lynne Walsh7-6, 6-4
2023-09-11vs All the Singles Ladies 3.0W SinglesLost 0–2
L#1 SinglesTannan Hagyard vs Keyonna Baker2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSusanne Gibbons vs Reoni Mapp4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
3.85
DONALD CRAWLEY
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.25
Marie Welsh
published —
3.06
Susanne Gibbons
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3
2.88
Karen Spano
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.85
Hannah Arnold Smith
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.79
Lindsay Preissler
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.74
Meghana Gupte
published —
2.34
Tannan Hagyard
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 2.5
—
Sophia Crawley
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Preissler + Susanne Gibbons2–24 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nichole Hauswirth
124W–46L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
DONALD CRAWLEY
473W–252L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
—
Marie Welsh
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.25
3
Susanne Gibbons
134W–126L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Karen Spano
88W–120L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Hannah Arnold Smith
47W–42L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Lindsay Preissler
97W–96L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
—
Meghana Gupte
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
2.5
Tannan Hagyard
36W–85L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%90%10%
2.34
—
Sophia Crawley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.