Teams

WNCL Holland (CCA)

NC Singles League 18 & Over WNC 2026 · 18+ Singles Women 3.0 - Sun PM

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-30vs WNCJ Gillis (Aston Park)Won 21
L#1 SinglesLeslie Grayson vs Jenni Trimble0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesRebecca Manske vs Jennifer German6-4, 3-0
W#3 SinglesLindsay Holland vs Virginia Scarola6-3, 6-3
2026-08-23vs WNCH McLaren (Aston Park)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesKathryn Pekarne vs Catharine Connell6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLeslie Grayson vs Kate Trefzger2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesAmy Rowe vs Anna Smith6-3, 6-1
2026-08-09vs WNCJ Gillis (Aston Park)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesLeslie Grayson vs Jennifer Malt1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesLindsay Holland vs Jhen Paulin Pagulayan6-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesRebecca Dent vs Jennifer German6-4, 6-3
2026-08-02vs WNCP van Vonno (ARC South)Won 21
W#1 SinglesRebecca Manske vs Caitlin Van Hecke6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLeslie Grayson vs Lauren Gennett6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesRebecca Dent vs Kirby Finger1-6, 0-6
2026-07-19vs WNCP van Vonno (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesRebecca Manske vs Kala White3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAmy Rowe vs Patricia van Vonno2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesLeslie Grayson vs Caitlin Van Hecke1-6, 5-7
2026-07-12vs WNCP van Vonno (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesRebecca Dent vs Hallie Gray3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLindsay Holland vs Kirby Finger2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesKathryn Pekarne vs Kala White3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-05vs WNCH McLaren (Aston Park)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesLindsay Holland vs Amy Smith6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesKathryn Pekarne vs Kate Trefzger3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesAmy Rowe vs Catharine Connell4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Singles Women 3.0 - Sun PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Lindsay Holland
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.83
Rebecca Manske
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.82
Kathryn Pekarne
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.58
Rebecca Dent
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.58
Leslie Grayson
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.54
Amy Rowe
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Holland + Leslie Grayson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Holland
16W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Rebecca Manske
17W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Kathryn Pekarne
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
Rebecca Dent
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58
Leslie Grayson
13W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%27%73%
2.58
2.5
Amy Rowe
3W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%39%61%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.