Teams

WNCJ Gillis (Aston Park)

NC Singles League 18 & Over WNC 2026 · 18+ Singles Women 3.0 - Sun PM

6 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-30vs WNCL Holland (CCA)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesJenni Trimble vs Leslie Grayson6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJennifer German vs Rebecca Manske4-6, 0-3
L#3 SinglesVirginia Scarola vs Lindsay Holland3-6, 3-6
2026-08-23vs WNCP van Vonno (ARC South)Won 21
L#1 SinglesJennifer Malt vs Caitlin Van Hecke0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJenni Trimble vs Kirby Finger6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJhen Paulin Pagulayan vs Patricia van Vonno6-0, 6-2
2026-08-15vs WNCH McLaren (Aston Park)Won 30
W#1 SinglesJenni Trimble vs Amy Smith6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJennifer Malt vs Hadley McLaren6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJennifer Gillis vs Abigail Sturgill6-1, 6-2
2026-08-09vs WNCL Holland (CCA)Won 21
W#1 SinglesJennifer Malt vs Leslie Grayson6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJhen Paulin Pagulayan vs Lindsay Holland7-6, 6-1
L#3 SinglesJennifer German vs Rebecca Dent4-6, 3-6
2026-08-04vs WNCH McLaren (Aston Park)Won 30
W#1 SinglesJenni Trimble vs Abigail Sturgill6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJhen Paulin Pagulayan vs Hadley McLaren6-3, 7-6
W#3 SinglesVirginia Scarola vs Colleen Riley6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2026-07-05vs WNCP van Vonno (ARC South)Won 30
W#1 SinglesJennifer Gillis vs Caitlin Van Hecke6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJenni Trimble vs Hallie Gray6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJhen Paulin Pagulayan vs Kirby Finger6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Singles Women 3.0 - Sun PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Jennifer Gillis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.10
Jennifer Malt
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.07
Jenni Trimble
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Singles 36% · published
2.94
Jhen Paulin Pagulayan
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.90
Virginia Scarola
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.65
Jennifer German
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer German + Virginia Scarola404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Gillis
22W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.11
Jennifer Malt
35W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.10
Jenni Trimble
16W–8L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
Jhen Paulin Pagulayan
15W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Virginia Scarola
24W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
Jennifer German
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.