Teams

WNCP van Vonno (ARC South)

NC Singles League 18 & Over WNC 2026 · 18+ Singles Women 3.0 - Sun PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-23vs WNCJ Gillis (Aston Park)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Van Hecke vs Jennifer Malt6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKirby Finger vs Jenni Trimble1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesPatricia van Vonno vs Jhen Paulin Pagulayan0-6, 2-6
2026-08-02vs WNCL Holland (CCA)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesCaitlin Van Hecke vs Rebecca Manske7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLauren Gennett vs Leslie Grayson1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKirby Finger vs Rebecca Dent6-1, 6-0
2026-07-26vs WNCH McLaren (Aston Park)Won 30
W#1 SinglesHallie Gray vs Hadley McLaren7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesPatricia van Vonno vs Anna Smith6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKylie Hopkins vs Colleen Riley6-1, 6-2
2026-07-19vs WNCL Holland (CCA)Won 30
W#1 SinglesKala White vs Rebecca Manske3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesPatricia van Vonno vs Amy Rowe6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesCaitlin Van Hecke vs Leslie Grayson6-1, 7-5
2026-07-12vs WNCL Holland (CCA)Won 30
W#1 SinglesHallie Gray vs Rebecca Dent6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKirby Finger vs Lindsay Holland6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKala White vs Kathryn Pekarne3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-05vs WNCJ Gillis (Aston Park)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesCaitlin Van Hecke vs Jennifer Gillis3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesHallie Gray vs Jenni Trimble2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKirby Finger vs Jhen Paulin Pagulayan1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Singles Women 3.0 - Sun PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Kylie Hopkins
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.09
Caitlin Van Hecke
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.96
Kirby Finger
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 29% · published
2.88
Hallie Gray
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.87
Patricia van Vonno
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.67
Kala White
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.33
Lauren Gennett
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kylie Hopkins
29W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.12
3
Caitlin Van Hecke
20W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.09
Kirby Finger
15W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
2.96
Hallie Gray
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Patricia van Vonno
23W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Kala White
16W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Lauren Gennett
8W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.