Teams

WNCH McLaren (Aston Park)

NC Singles League 18 & Over WNC 2026 · 18+ Singles Women 3.0 - Sun PM

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-23vs WNCL Holland (CCA)Won 20
W#1 SinglesCatharine Connell vs Kathryn Pekarne6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKate Trefzger vs Leslie Grayson6-2, 6-2
2026-08-15vs WNCJ Gillis (Aston Park)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesHadley McLaren vs Jennifer Malt3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAbigail Sturgill vs Jennifer Gillis1-6, 2-6
2026-08-04vs WNCJ Gillis (Aston Park)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesAbigail Sturgill vs Jenni Trimble3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesHadley McLaren vs Jhen Paulin Pagulayan3-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesColleen Riley vs Virginia Scarola7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2026-07-26vs WNCP van Vonno (ARC South)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesHadley McLaren vs Hallie Gray5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 SinglesColleen Riley vs Kylie Hopkins1-6, 2-6
2026-07-05vs WNCL Holland (CCA)Won 20
W#2 SinglesKate Trefzger vs Kathryn Pekarne6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesCatharine Connell vs Amy Rowe6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Singles Women 3.0 - Sun PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Hadley McLaren
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.83
Lindsay Broughel
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.78
Kate Trefzger
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.66
Colleen Flynn
published 3
2.65
Abigail Sturgill
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.64
Catharine Connell
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.25
Colleen Riley
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catharine Connell + Kate Trefzger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hadley McLaren
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Lindsay Broughel
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Kate Trefzger
25W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Colleen Flynn
22W–12L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Abigail Sturgill
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.65
3
Catharine Connell
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
2.5
Colleen Riley
1W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.