Teams

LRC-Berry/Hudson LRC-19 Survivors

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.56 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-19vs YTC-DonahueWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Lipton / Angela Brinkhaus vs Audrey James / ReNae Sevigny6-4, 6-4
2021-06-18vs GAC-Gorge AthleticWon 10
W#3 DoublesAngela Brinkhaus / Lory Allen vs Rebecca Roland / Melanie Finstad7-6, 6-4
2021-06-18vs Peak-HuntLost 01
L#1 SinglesAngela Brinkhaus vs Merri Wells6-7, 5-7
2021-04-24vs JTC-ReevesWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnneke Berry / Dana Johnston vs Myrna Alquiza / Geraldine Carlos4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesShirley Shen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTamara Rosenbloom / Angela Brinkhaus vs Shawli Hathaway / Sheri Borden6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSherri Cail / Gayle Pinkard vs Penny Quinn / Sue Dillard6-2, 7-6
2021-04-11vs TLTC-ElofsonWon 40
W#1 DoublesAnneke Berry / Dana Johnston vs Lee Bowman / Marcie Osborn4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesShirley Shen vs Meagan Kula6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLisa Hudson / Gayle Pinkard vs Mary Louise Hassan / Heidi Hurst6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Kendall / MAIMAI BENSON vs Mary Donahue / Sheila Ryan6-4, 6-1
2021-03-28vs VAC-ArnoldWon 40
W#1 DoublesAnneke Berry / Lisa Hudson vs Anita Stohr / Nancy Arnold6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesShirley Shen vs Christine Nall6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTamara Rosenbloom / Angela Brinkhaus vs Karen Tracy / Jill Waters7-5, 4-3
W#3 DoublesGayle Pinkard / Sherri Cail vs Ellen Stagnone / Deborah Sargeant6-4, 6-3
2021-03-21vs GTC-Brawley-Cook Shot MakersWon 40
W#1 DoublesAnneke Berry / Dana Johnston vs Catherine Mcnaughton / Selina Lai6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCharae Hulburt vs Mayumi Barber7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTamara Rosenbloom / Angela Brinkhaus vs Ellen Reeves / Kelly Thompson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Hudson / Gayle Pinkard vs Hwayoung Srein / KuiCha Davison4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-03-14vs SPR-BerrySplit 22
L#1 DoublesCharae Hulburt / Lisa Hudson vs Sheila Berry / Denise Dickerson3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAnneke Berry vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Kendall / MAIMAI BENSON vs Kathi McKay / Barbara Wyatt2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTamara Rosenbloom / Angela Brinkhaus vs Karyn Williamson / Heidi Hollyhead6-4, 6-3
2021-03-07vs VAC-HerrickWon 40
W#1 DoublesAnneke Berry / Dana Johnston vs Charlet Herrick / Karen Abbott6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesShirley Shen vs Chun Saul6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Hudson / Charae Hulburt vs Debra Moody / Joyce Duerfeldt6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSherri Cail / Rebecca Kendall vs Gretchen Gacetta / Kristen Case6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Shirley Shen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Tamara Rosenbloom
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
MAIMAI BENSON
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.27
Anneke Berry
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3.5
Dana Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Angela Brinkhaus
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.20
Gayle Pinkard
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Lisa Hudson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Charae Hulburt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Sherri Cail
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charae Hulburt + Lisa Hudson11559% games+8.8% vs expected
Anneke Berry + Angela Brinkhaus4360% games+5.8% vs expected
Shirley Shen + Charae Hulburt10559% games+4.8% vs expected
Shirley Shen + MAIMAI BENSON11358% games+2.6% vs expected
Charae Hulburt + Angela Brinkhaus5452% games+2.0% vs expected
Angela Brinkhaus + Tamara Rosenbloom15855% games+1.9% vs expected
Tamara Rosenbloom + Lisa Hudson2746% games+1.1% vs expected
Anneke Berry + Lisa Hudson10456% games+0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Shirley Shen
125W–71L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Tamara Rosenbloom
190W–151L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
4
MAIMAI BENSON
141W–83L career · 2 lines in 2021
93%7%<1%
3.31
3.5
Anneke Berry
128W–122L career · 7 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Dana Johnston
70W–58L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Angela Brinkhaus
152W–100L career · 7 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Gayle Pinkard
94W–62L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Lisa Hudson
114W–104L career · 6 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Charae Hulburt
156W–115L career · 6 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
0
Sherri Cail
25W–60L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.