← Search

Sherri Cail

Tacoma, WA
0.0 year-end
85 matches · 25W–60L · seasons 2019–2024
Where Sherri sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Sherri is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sherri has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Sherri has gone from the 13th to the 13th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 47.5% of games
3.5
57.9%
11W–8L · 49.9% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 39.4% of games
7.0
20%
5W–20L · 40.4% of games
8.0
0%
0W–5L · 26.2% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 29% of games
7.0mixed
35%
7W–13L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history85 matches
L
Lisa Smith / Gretchen Leanderson
2023-10-29 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Thompson
−0.015below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Peggy Blankenship / Sue Brockmann
2023-10-08 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Thompson
+0.019better than expected — took 65% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2023-09-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Thompson
−0.058below expectation — took 14% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-09-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debby Sigel
+0.000about as expected — took 40% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2023-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Min
−0.034below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jun Zhu
−0.032below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2023-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debby Sigel
+0.020better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2023-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joseph Staeheli
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Lee Anna Bonds / Barbara Turner
2023-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connie Worthen
+0.071better than expected — took 92% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2023-03-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ken Enslow
+0.000below expectation — took 40% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
John Hilmes / Huijuan Zhangchamps
2022-10-01 · #3 Doubles · with Scott Baird
−0.057below expectation — took 32% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2022-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debby Sigel
−0.026below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.