Teams

VAC-Arnold

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.11 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-04-18vs VAC-HerrickLost 04
L#1 DoublesJill Waters / Nancy Arnold vs Joyce Duerfeldt / Karen Abbott7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMartha Maggi vs Chun Saul1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnita Stohr / Sharon Weinberg vs Gretchen Gacetta / Janie Daray5-7, 5-4
L#3 DoublesEllen Stagnone / Felicity Womer vs Violet Clerget / Debra Moody5-7, 6-5
2021-04-10vs GTC-Brawley-Cook Shot MakersLost 13
L#1 DoublesNancy Arnold / Karen Tracy vs Selina Lai / Carol Bricker5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMartha Maggi vs Karen Cook6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Koeppen / Sharon Weinberg vs Carolyn Forbes / Ilene Anderson4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Howard / Felicity Womer vs Katherine Steuart / Lyudmila Kunitsa4-6, 2-6
2021-03-28vs LRC-Berry/Hudson LRC-19 SurvivorsLost 04
L#1 DoublesAnita Stohr / Nancy Arnold vs Anneke Berry / Lisa Hudson2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesChristine Nall vs Shirley Shen0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Tracy / Jill Waters vs Tamara Rosenbloom / Angela Brinkhaus5-7, 3-4
L#3 DoublesEllen Stagnone / Deborah Sargeant vs Gayle Pinkard / Sherri Cail4-6, 3-6
2021-03-21vs SPR-BerryLost 04
L#1 DoublesJill Waters / Karen Tracy vs Sheila Berry / Denise Dickerson2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMartha Maggi vs Tetyana Sych3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanie Davis / Nancy Arnold vs Kathi McKay / Barbara Wyatt4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Koeppen / Anita Stohr vs Kristen Schnabel / Kim Nazzal4-6, 3-6
2021-03-13vs KTAC-Russell/EngelhardSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNancy Arnold / Jill Waters vs Naomi Kaneko / Chris Stewart5-7, 5-5
L#1 SinglesNancy Koeppen vs Uyen Lee1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanie Davis / Christine Nall vs Karen Fossum / Carole Schaefer6-7, 4-1
W#3 DoublesMartha Maggi / Terri Murray vs Christine Cattell / Frances Shaw4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-03-07vs VAC-Hunter/Jones FireballsLost 13
W#1 DoublesChristine Nall / Janie Davis vs Mary Ellen Jones / Maria Robinson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJill Waters vs Tristan Wise1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Tracy / Nancy Koeppen vs Carol Peebles / Jill Shanda2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMartha Maggi / Sandy Howard vs Kelley Hunter / Claudia Shanley5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Christine Nall
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Jill Waters
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.02
Sharon Abegg
published 3.5
2.94
Ellen Stagnone
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.89
Karen Tracy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Deborah Sargeant
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Janie Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Martha Maggi
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.79
Felicity Womer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Anita Stohr
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Terri Murray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Nancy Koeppen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.67
Nancy Arnold
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.64
Sandy Howard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Sharon Weinberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Stagnone + Deborah Sargeant7453% games+11.1% vs expected
Nancy Koeppen + Deborah Sargeant3450% games+7.2% vs expected
Jill Waters + Sharon Weinberg4252% games+6.5% vs expected
Ellen Stagnone + Terri Murray3942% games+4.1% vs expected
Ellen Stagnone + Karen Tracy1739% games+3.5% vs expected
Sharon Abegg + Deborah Sargeant7648% games+3.2% vs expected
Nancy Arnold + Karen Tracy2845% games+0.9% vs expected
Ellen Stagnone + Felicity Womer8556% games−2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Nall
25W–46L career · 3 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Jill Waters
104W–94L career · 5 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Sharon Abegg
77W–109L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Ellen Stagnone
136W–120L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Karen Tracy
18W–83L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Deborah Sargeant
67W–65L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Janie Davis
30W–51L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Martha Maggi
60W–54L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Felicity Womer
60W–38L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Anita Stohr
35W–46L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Terri Murray
27W–62L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
3
Nancy Koeppen
103W–138L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Nancy Arnold
37W–69L career · 5 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Sandy Howard
36W–74L career · 8 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
2.64
0
Sharon Weinberg
29W–23L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.