Teams

8SCWB-GAY 35MEN SING SEM

2024 SEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · MEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-16vs 1EAST-GRANGER 35MEN SING SEMLost 12
L#1 SinglesBill Casey vs Francesco Biondi6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRod Beard vs Aniket Wankhede2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesChee Cheong vs Kevin Marvin6-1, 6-1
2024-11-10vs 5BLOOM-SINGH 35MEN SING SEMLost 12
L#1 SinglesBill Casey vs Satyajeet Sahu5-7, 3-2
W#2 SinglesChee Cheong vs Gbenga Ogunyanwo7-6, 3-1
L#3 SinglesJohnny Malcom vs PRASAD SUBBARAO3-6, 2-6
2024-11-02vs 4EAST-NIEWOIT 35MEN SING SEMLost 03
L#1 SinglesJulian Gay vs Blaine Borchardt3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJohnny Malcom vs Gerard Rizarri2-6, 3-4
L#3 SinglesHerbert White vs Nikolaos Maragkos0-6, 3-6
2024-10-27vs 3LIB-WYNN 35MEN SING SEMLost 03
L#1 SinglesJulian Gay vs Brandon Meloche1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesHerbert White vs Jon Oberheide0-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesStanislav Leynzon vs Nolan Orfield1-6, 1-6
2024-10-19vs 6CHIP-NAMBO 35MEN SING SEMLost 12
W#1 SinglesBill Casey vs Max Wong6-7, 1-1
L#2 SinglesRod Beard vs Victor Nambo5-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJeffrey Rooke vs Michael LeVigne2-6, 1-6
2024-10-06vs 2FAC-ROSS 35MEN SING SEMLost 03
L#1 SinglesJulian Gay vs Jacob Sa3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesHerbert White vs Robert Cupples1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesStanislav Leynzon vs Andrew Hoffman3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Bill Casey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Herbert White
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Jeffrey Rooke
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Julian Gay
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Chee Cheong
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Johnny Malcom
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Rod Beard
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Stanislav Leynzon
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julian Gay + Rod Beard6649% games+7.2% vs expected
Jeffrey Rooke + Herbert White404 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Rooke + Chee Cheong213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bill Casey
50W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Herbert White
41W–27L career · type M · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Jeffrey Rooke
69W–63L career · 1 line in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Julian Gay
54W–111L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Chee Cheong
54W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Johnny Malcom
3W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
2.87
Rod Beard
34W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stanislav Leynzon
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.