Teams

3LIB-WYNN 35MEN SING SEM

2024 SEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · MEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-09vs 6CHIP-NAMBO 35MEN SING SEMWon 30
W#1 SinglesJon Oberheide vs Alexander Fabiszewski2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBrian Loh vs Michael LeVigne6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMichael Chaize vs Manuel Meza-Arroyo6-4, 6-3
2024-11-02vs 2FAC-ROSS 35MEN SING SEMLost 03
L#1 SinglesBrian Loh vs Jacob Sa7-5, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMichael Chaize vs Robert Cupples4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJeremy Somers vs Andrew Hoffman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-27vs 8SCWB-GAY 35MEN SING SEMWon 30
W#1 SinglesBrandon Meloche vs Julian Gay6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJon Oberheide vs Herbert White6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesNolan Orfield vs Stanislav Leynzon6-1, 6-1
2024-10-19vs 5BLOOM-SINGH 35MEN SING SEMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBrandon Meloche vs AMANPREET SINGH6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMichael Wynn vs Madhu Dayananthan4-6, 2-3
2024-10-13vs 4EAST-NIEWOIT 35MEN SING SEMWon 10
W#2 SinglesLonnie Shea vs Gerard Rizarri6-1, 7-6
2024-10-05vs 1EAST-GRANGER 35MEN SING SEMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJeremy Somers vs Aniket Wankhede7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMichael Wynn vs Sean Granger3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Jon Oberheide
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.70
Brandon Meloche
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.48
Lonnie Shea
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.47
Nolan Orfield
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.45
Michael Chaize
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.44
Brian Loh
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Jeremy Somers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Michael Wynn
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Patrick Haley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Oberheide + Brandon Meloche5069% gamesnot enough data
Brian Loh + Jeremy Somers314 matchesnot enough data
Brian Loh + Michael Wynn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jon Oberheide
35W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Brandon Meloche
31W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Lonnie Shea
83W–27L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
Nolan Orfield
28W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Michael Chaize
42W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Brian Loh
115W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Jeremy Somers
73W–69L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Michael Wynn
65W–70L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patrick Haley
24W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.