Teams

1EAST-GRANGER 35MEN SING SEM

2024 SEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · MEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-16vs 8SCWB-GAY 35MEN SING SEMWon 21
W#1 SinglesFrancesco Biondi vs Bill Casey1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAniket Wankhede vs Rod Beard6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesKevin Marvin vs Chee Cheong1-6, 1-6
2024-11-02vs 6CHIP-NAMBO 35MEN SING SEMLost 03
L#1 SinglesAniket Wankhede vs Alexander Fabiszewski1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesNaim Edwards vs Christopher Heimburger0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesNicholas Gargaro vs Thamer Sartawi2-6, 5-7
2024-10-26vs 5BLOOM-SINGH 35MEN SING SEMWon 21
W#1 SinglesFrancesco Biondi vs Satyajeet Sahu7-6, 4-3
L#2 SinglesNick Johnson vs Madhup Singh6-7, 2-4
W#3 SinglesSean Granger vs PRASAD SUBBARAO6-0, 6-2
2024-10-18vs 4EAST-NIEWOIT 35MEN SING SEMLost 03
L#1 SinglesNick Johnson vs Aaron Work3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesNaim Edwards vs Leon Niewoit2-6, 5-5
L#3 SinglesKevin Marvin vs Manuel Alejo4-6, 1-5
2024-10-05vs 3LIB-WYNN 35MEN SING SEMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAniket Wankhede vs Jeremy Somers6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesSean Granger vs Michael Wynn6-3, 6-2
2024-09-27vs 2FAC-ROSS 35MEN SING SEMLost 03
L#1 SinglesNaim Edwards vs Jacob Sa0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSean Granger vs Robert Cupples1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKevin Marvin vs Nicolas Fedirko0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Nick Johnson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.43
Francesco Biondi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.29
Mike Downey
published 3.5
3.19
Aniket Wankhede
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Naim Edwards
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.08
Sean Granger
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.08
Kevin Marvin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Nicholas Gargaro
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Naim Edwards + Kevin Marvin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nick Johnson
41W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.79
4
Francesco Biondi
13W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Mike Downey
122W–84L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Aniket Wankhede
20W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Naim Edwards
30W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Sean Granger
67W–79L career · 3 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Kevin Marvin
53W–91L career · 3 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
Nicholas Gargaro
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.