Teams

6CHIP-NAMBO 35MEN SING SEM

2024 SEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · MEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-16vs 4EAST-NIEWOIT 35MEN SING SEMLost 12
L#1 SinglesThamer Sartawi vs Nikolaos Maragkos3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesVictor Nambo vs Reiner Schmidt6-4, 5-6
L#3 SinglesGeorge Loutts vs Manuel Alejo3-6, 2-4
2024-11-09vs 3LIB-WYNN 35MEN SING SEMLost 03
L#1 SinglesAlexander Fabiszewski vs Jon Oberheide2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMichael LeVigne vs Brian Loh1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesManuel Meza-Arroyo vs Michael Chaize4-6, 3-6
2024-11-02vs 1EAST-GRANGER 35MEN SING SEMWon 30
W#1 SinglesAlexander Fabiszewski vs Aniket Wankhede6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesChristopher Heimburger vs Naim Edwards6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesThamer Sartawi vs Nicholas Gargaro6-2, 7-5
2024-10-27vs 2FAC-ROSS 35MEN SING SEMLost 12
W#1 SinglesChristopher Heimburger vs Nicolas Fedirko7-5, 5-3
L#2 SinglesMichael LeVigne vs Jacob Sa4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesGeorge Loutts vs Andrew Hoffman4-6, 4-4
2024-10-19vs 8SCWB-GAY 35MEN SING SEMWon 21
L#1 SinglesMax Wong vs Bill Casey7-6, 1-1
W#2 SinglesVictor Nambo vs Rod Beard7-5, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMichael LeVigne vs Jeffrey Rooke6-2, 6-1
2024-09-28vs 5BLOOM-SINGH 35MEN SING SEMLost 12
L#1 SinglesManuel Meza-Arroyo vs Satyajeet Sahu0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMichael LeVigne vs Madhup Singh5-7, 4-4
W#3 SinglesGeorge Loutts vs SRINIVAS ARCOTA6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Alexander Fabiszewski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.75
Christopher Heimburger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.42
Max Wong
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.39
Victor Nambo
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Evans Boeve
published
3.18
George Loutts
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Thamer Sartawi
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Manuel Meza-Arroyo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Michael LeVigne
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexander Fabiszewski
112W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Christopher Heimburger
53W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
Max Wong
16W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Victor Nambo
45W–47L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Evans Boeve
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
George Loutts
59W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Thamer Sartawi
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Manuel Meza-Arroyo
36W–55L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael LeVigne
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.