Teams

CV-Mission Hills/Evans

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-09vs CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/SaharaLost 01
L#2 DoublesManuela Andrews / Sue Lambert vs Sally Sterling / Rhonda Kazdan2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSue Lambert / Manuela Andrews vs Donna Wrigley / Valerie Brown6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesPatricia Dudley / Sally Mangina vs Lisa Morgan / Mary Read4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSue Lambert / Page Garcia vs Donna Sunseri / Lisa Symmonds7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSue Lambert / Susan Devereaux vs Ann Skrobut / Julian Myers Benton6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesManuela Andrews / Camille Lamoureux vs Susan Parker / Tiffany Baker6-2, 6-3
2025-02-05vs CV-Sun City PD/N KimWon 20
W#1 DoublesSheryl Fewkes / Cheryl Evans vs Lori Greenman / Janice Ashton6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCamille Lamoureux / Susan Devereaux vs Michele Mcgee / Evie Seifu6-1, 7-5
2025-01-22vs CV-Rancho Las Palmas/PotterLost 01
L#2 DoublesSheryl Fewkes / Patricia Dudley vs Susan Brooks / Carrie Morton1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSally Mangina / Lori Romania vs Lori Irwin / Pam Stafford2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Sheryl Fewkes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Cheryl Evans
published 4
3.63
Camille Lamoureux
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Sally Mangina
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Kerry Peterson
published
Lori Romania
published
Michelle Churis
published
Page Garcia
published
Patricia Dudley
published
Sue Lambert
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Devereaux
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheryl Fewkes + Lori Romania224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sheryl Fewkes
75W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Cheryl Evans
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Camille Lamoureux
19W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Sally Mangina
127W–117L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Kerry Peterson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Romania
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Churis
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Page Garcia
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Dudley
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sue Lambert
32W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Devereaux
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.