Teams

CV-Rancho Las Palmas/Potter

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-02vs CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/SaharaLost 01
L#3 DoublesCheryl Capriola / Carrie Morton vs Helen Hannaford / Ria Lepage3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesJanis Barbash / Carla Breton vs Carole Myser / Leslie Ellis6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoan Hall / Pamela Milroy vs Donna Wrigley / Sue Cannon3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Closson / Monica McCready vs Mistie Iseman / Julie House6-2, 7-5
2025-02-26vs CV-Mission Hills/EvansWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarla Breton / Monica McCready vs Patricia Dudley / Page Garcia6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJanis Barbash / Cheryl Capriola vs Monterey Xepoleas / Cheryl Evans6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesWanda Ramos / Kirsten Fatland vs Lisa McIntosh / Michelle Churis6-4, 6-2
2025-02-19vs CV-Sun City PD/N KimWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarla Breton / Monica McCready vs Mary Monahan / Judy Theriault6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCheryl Capriola / Pamela Milroy vs Kathy McCann / Janet Tallett1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-02-12vs CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/SaharaLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarla Breton / Monica McCready vs Kristen Jacobs / Tammy Pronenko6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesWanda Ramos / Kirsten Fatland vs Ria Lepage / Helen Hannaford2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Closson / Carrie Morton vs Lisa Lucht / Donna Karam1-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesJanis Barbash / Carla Breton vs Mistie Iseman / Maureen Jaramillo6-4, 6-3
2025-01-22vs CV-Mission Hills/EvansSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarla Breton / Pamela Milroy vs Page Garcia / Kerry Peterson6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCheryl Capriola / Susan Potter vs Cheryl Evans / Michelle Churis0-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesJanis Barbash / Carla Breton vs Lisa Symmonds / Donna Sunseri6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMonica McCready / Jill Lawrence Polls vs Lori Hayes / Janet Gallagher0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJanis Barbash / Carla Breton vs Tiffany Baker / Christine Querrey6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCheryl Capriola / Pamela Milroy vs Susan Parker / Ann Skrobut6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Kirsten Fatland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.09
Janis Barbash
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.95
Carla Breton
published 4
3.91
Jody Stewart
published
3.91
Pamela Milroy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Gianna Riley
published
3.75
Cheryl Capriola
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.54
Joan Hall
published
3.54
Sandra Schmid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Wanda Ramos
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.16
Carrie Morton
published 4
Jill Lawrence Polls
published
Monica McCready
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Nancy Closson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Potter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Closson + Pamela Milroy6557% gamesnot enough data
Wanda Ramos + Monica McCready4255% gamesnot enough data
Wanda Ramos + Kirsten Fatland4257% gamesnot enough data
Janis Barbash + Pamela Milroy404 matchesnot enough data
Janis Barbash + Carla Breton213 matchesnot enough data
Monica McCready + Cheryl Capriola213 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Milroy + Cheryl Capriola213 matchesnot enough data
Jody Stewart + Carrie Morton303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kirsten Fatland
127W–71L career · 6 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
Janis Barbash
43W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
4.09
4
Carla Breton
77W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
Jody Stewart
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Pamela Milroy
112W–68L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Gianna Riley
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Cheryl Capriola
114W–48L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Joan Hall
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
Sandra Schmid
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
Wanda Ramos
74W–60L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
4
Carrie Morton
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.16
Jill Lawrence Polls
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica McCready
92W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Closson
157W–86L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Potter
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.