Teams

CV-Sun City PD/N Kim

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 DoublesMary Monahan / Grace Baraniak vs Connie Masciorini / Bette Kerhoulas7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnn Morford / Janet Tallett vs Rikki Daniels / Judy Anderson3-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesJudy Theriault / Kathy McCann vs Donna Sunseri / Cathy Evangelist3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Tallett / Ann Crampton vs Patrice Duffy / Lori Hayes6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-19vs CV-Rancho Las Palmas/PotterLost 02
L#2 DoublesKathy McCann / Janet Tallett vs Cheryl Capriola / Pamela Milroy6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNadine Kim / Catherine Lind vs Carrie Morton / Gianna Riley6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMarian Zalewski / Nadine Kim vs Valerie Brown / Mistie Iseman2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathy McCann / Dori Craft vs Pam Stafford / Kimberly Skorupa4-6, 6-7
2025-02-05vs CV-Mission Hills/EvansLost 01
L#2 DoublesNadine Kim / Catherine Lind vs Patricia Dudley / Kerry Peterson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMarian Zalewski / Lori Greenman vs Patrice Duffy / Cathy Evangelist6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKathy McCann / Janet Tallett vs Lisa Morgan / Mary Read1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesMarian Zalewski / Nadine Kim vs DeEtte Mountford / Christine Querrey1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGrace Baraniak / Ann Crampton vs Connie Masciorini / Bette Kerhoulas4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDori Craft / Catherine Lind vs Susan Parker / Cathy Long4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-01-08vs CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/SaharaLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy McCann / Janet Tallett vs Lisa Lucht / Sally Sterling3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Lori Greenman
published
Catherine Lind
published 4
3.72
Janet Tallett
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.56
Grace Baraniak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Evie Seifu
published
3.45
Kathy McCann
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.43
Judy Theriault
published
3.41
Janice Ashton
published
3.35
Nadine Kim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Ann Morford
published 3.5
3.16
Ann Crampton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dori Craft
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marian Zalewski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michele Mcgee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grace Baraniak + Dori Craft134 matchesnot enough data
Janet Tallett + Kathy McCann134 matchesnot enough data
Grace Baraniak + Nadine Kim123 matchesnot enough data
Marian Zalewski + Nadine Kim123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Greenman
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.90
4
Catherine Lind
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Tallett
91W–65L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
Grace Baraniak
61W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
Evie Seifu
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
4
Kathy McCann
104W–124L career · 5 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
Judy Theriault
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Janice Ashton
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.41
Nadine Kim
90W–96L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Ann Morford
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Ann Crampton
51W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Dori Craft
18W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marian Zalewski
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Mcgee
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.