Teams

Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.0

2024 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

22 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Sarah Sparling
published
4.01
Meg Lohr
published
3.95
3.94
Ha Tran
published
3.90
Gale Dunleavy
published
3.85
Bridget Goldman
published 4
3.84
Paula Brunson
published
3.80
Lisa Nammari
published
3.79
Ann Thornton
published 4
3.78
Maria Hasbany
published
3.77
Holly Lewis
published
3.75
Lisa Lajous
published
3.75
Jerilynn Fletcher
published
3.73
Tricia Roos
published
3.73
Jill McGill
published
3.71
Suzanne Flournoy
published
3.68
Christine Rogers
published 4
3.66
Diane Hashimoto
published 4
3.66
Tanya Musick
published
3.60
Mary Beirute
published
Heather Neilson
published
Jessica Tse
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Rogers + Tanya Musick8259% games+9.5% vs expected
Sue Lopez de Correia + Ha Tran7259% games−1.5% vs expected
Diane Hashimoto + Ha Tran3649% games−4.6% vs expected
Lisa Nammari + Suzanne Flournoy4261% games−6.4% vs expected
Tanya Musick + Sarah Sparling4356% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Nammari + Meg Lohr404 matchesnot enough data
Paula Brunson + Jerilynn Fletcher314 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Nammari + Sarah Sparling303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Sparling
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
4.02
Meg Lohr
35W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
4.01
Sue Lopez de Correia
27W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.95
Ha Tran
26W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.94
Gale Dunleavy
11W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Bridget Goldman
15W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.85
Paula Brunson
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
Lisa Nammari
25W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Ann Thornton
30W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
Maria Hasbany
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Holly Lewis
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Lisa Lajous
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
Jerilynn Fletcher
25W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
Tricia Roos
19W–11L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Jill McGill
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.73
Suzanne Flournoy
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Christine Rogers
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Diane Hashimoto
15W–27L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
Tanya Musick
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
Mary Beirute
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Heather Neilson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jessica Tse
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.