Teams

CDTA S M40&O7.0X b.Score Thompson Thur 7 $20

CDTA Summer Mixed 40 & Over · CDTA S Mix 40 & Over 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesJeff Lemna / Ausra Vitkauskas vs Billy Lin / Rochelle Probst1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRICHARD FEFFER / Janice Scott vs Emily Lund / Chen Cheng4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDavid HOFFLICH / Jill Lauesen vs Jason Hui / Jeanne Tromp2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesMichael David / Jill Lauesen vs Valerie Cook / Austin Weisenbeck2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJeff Lemna / Becky Lemna vs Stephanie Remelius / Richard McLean6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRaynard Laylo / Marion Thompson vs Toni Mountcastle / Thomas Strickler5-7, 1-6
W#1 DoublesNorbert Glod / Wendy Pochocki vs Cathy Abbott / Gerald Abbott7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRICHARD FEFFER / Erica White vs Jennifer Huffaker / David Zirkle2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMick Brennan / Carla Gonzales vs Michelle Parks / Steve Blaha0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesNorbert Glod / Janice Scott vs Derek Majka / Sue Christianson2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesNorbert Glod / Wendy Pochocki vs Michael Roth / Allycn Grcevic6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael David / Carla Gonzales vs Dwight Janzen / Patricia Kladis-Schiappa5-7, 4-5
W#3 DoublesRICHARD FEFFER / Ausra Vitkauskas vs Tom Ward / Kimberly Bryant6-4, 7-5
W#1 DoublesErica White / Norbert Glod vs Christopher Jepsen / Alison Miller7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid HOFFLICH / Janice Scott vs Mariusz Cislak / Meg Greenberg1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA S Mix 40 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S M40&O7.0X a.MT Bann(OUT) Koliatsis Tues 6:30 $255114410127
2CDTA S M40&O7.0X f.Berens Park(OUT) Barsotti Fri 75114410140
3CDTA S M40&O7.0X c.Tam Lam Tue 7 $225113514130
4CDTA S M40&O7.0X e.Homewood Denne Tue 7 $203381022176
5CDTA S M40&O7.0X b.Score Thompson Thur 7 $202451328200
6CDTA S M40&O7.0X d.Hinsdale Janzen Tue 7 $221531530195
7CDTA S M40&O7.0X g.River Trails Miller Tue 7:30 $220661226172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ausra Vitkauskas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Erica White
published 4
3.49
Norbert Glod
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Janice Scott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Becky Lemna
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Jill Lauesen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Raynard Laylo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Wendy Pochocki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Jeff Lemna
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
RICHARD FEFFER
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Carla Gonzales
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.46
Marion Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
David HOFFLICH
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michael David
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mick Brennan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marion Thompson + Norbert Glod152247% games+13.3% vs expected
Wendy Pochocki + Norbert Glod3354% games+5.2% vs expected
Becky Lemna + Jeff Lemna393850% games+3.7% vs expected
Marion Thompson + Raynard Laylo01425% games−13.6% vs expected
Jill Lauesen + Norbert Glod41339% games−17.7% vs expected
Ausra Vitkauskas + Norbert Glod141055% gamesnot enough data
Jill Lauesen + RICHARD FEFFER51439% gamesnot enough data
Ausra Vitkauskas + RICHARD FEFFER51245% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ausra Vitkauskas
33W–46L career · type M · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Erica White
29W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Norbert Glod
161W–162L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Janice Scott
50W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Becky Lemna
129W–114L career · 1 line in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Jill Lauesen
62W–130L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.15
Raynard Laylo
65W–113L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.13
Wendy Pochocki
16W–83L career · 2 lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Jeff Lemna
67W–79L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
3
RICHARD FEFFER
30W–82L career · type M · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Carla Gonzales
15W–40L career · type M · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marion Thompson
63W–216L career · 1 line in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.46
David HOFFLICH
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael David
33W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mick Brennan
13W–39L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.