Teams

CDTA S M40&O7.0X c.Tam Lam Tue 7 $22

CDTA Summer Mixed 40 & Over · CDTA S Mix 40 & Over 7.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.60 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesBilly Lin / Rochelle Probst vs Jeff Lemna / Ausra Vitkauskas6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEmily Lund / Chen Cheng vs RICHARD FEFFER / Janice Scott6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJason Hui / Jeanne Tromp vs David HOFFLICH / Jill Lauesen6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesEmily Lund / Chen Cheng vs Shelley Young / Michael Denne4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Lam / Jason Hui vs Gerald Abbott / Cathy Abbott6-4, 4-2
L#3 DoublesJulie Hahn / Billy Lin vs Michelle Parks / Marty Weathers3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesEmily Paris / Billy Lin vs Karin Matura / Michael Roth6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDenise Lam / Brian Atad vs Kristin Lamb / Dwight Janzen6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNina Friedman / Mark Ainsworth vs Jeanine Janzen / Romeen Lavani6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesNina Friedman / Young Choi vs Apple Naughton / Cristobal GARCIA6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristi Harrison / Brian Atad vs Shawn Erickson / Meg Greenberg6-7, 2-0
W#2 DoublesYoung Choi / Denise Lam vs Howard Braun / Rita Eichner6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBrian Atad / Christi Harrison vs William Strickley / Julie Schwan2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesYoung Choi / Nina Friedman vs James Humpherson / Carolyn Humpherson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBilly Lin / Emily Paris vs Jazz Burks / Toni Mountcastle6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMark Ainsworth / Michelle Yeh vs Austin Weisenbeck / Valerie Cook1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA S Mix 40 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S M40&O7.0X a.MT Bann(OUT) Koliatsis Tues 6:30 $255114410127
2CDTA S M40&O7.0X f.Berens Park(OUT) Barsotti Fri 75114410140
3CDTA S M40&O7.0X c.Tam Lam Tue 7 $225113514130
4CDTA S M40&O7.0X e.Homewood Denne Tue 7 $203381022176
5CDTA S M40&O7.0X b.Score Thompson Thur 7 $202451328200
6CDTA S M40&O7.0X d.Hinsdale Janzen Tue 7 $221531530195
7CDTA S M40&O7.0X g.River Trails Miller Tue 7:30 $220661226172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Huan Chang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Emily Paris
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Emily Lund
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Denise Lam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.56
Mark Ainsworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Billy Lin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Chen Cheng
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Jeanne Tromp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Christi Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Brian Atad
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Rochelle Probst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Michelle Yeh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Dan Chiss
published 3
Jason Hui
published
Julie Hahn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nick Paterakos
published
Nina Friedman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Atad + Michelle Yeh5250% games+6.0% vs expected
Billy Lin + Emily Lund11071% gamesnot enough data
Nick Paterakos + Julie Hahn4352% gamesnot enough data
Nick Paterakos + Emily Paris7064% gamesnot enough data
Jason Hui + Denise Lam5164% gamesnot enough data
Brian Atad + Denise Lam3343% gamesnot enough data
Mark Ainsworth + Jeanne Tromp5063% gamesnot enough data
Chen Cheng + Emily Lund5063% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Huan Chang
201W–143L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Emily Paris
70W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Emily Lund
256W–130L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Denise Lam
320W–95L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%20%80%
3.61
Mark Ainsworth
52W–93L career · 2 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Billy Lin
94W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Chen Cheng
65W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Jeanne Tromp
144W–60L career · 1 line in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Christi Harrison
54W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Brian Atad
133W–124L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
Rochelle Probst
67W–49L career · 1 line in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12
Michelle Yeh
68W–35L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Dan Chiss
1W–3L career · type M · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jason Hui
32W–30L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Hahn
127W–102L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nick Paterakos
93W–57L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nina Friedman
6W–0L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.