Teams

CDTA S M40&O7.0X f.Berens Park(OUT) Barsotti Fri 7

CDTA Summer Mixed 40 & Over · CDTA S Mix 40 & Over 7.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.75 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesGrace Kuhrt / Richard McLean vs Atwood Burns / Wendy Leto7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesValerie Cook / Austin Weisenbeck vs Karin Matura / Michael Roth6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesValerie Cook / Austin Weisenbeck vs David Zirkle / Shelley Young6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesToni Mountcastle / Jazz Burks vs Cathy Abbott / Gerald Abbott7-5, 6-4
W#1 DoublesValerie Cook / Austin Weisenbeck vs Michael David / Jill Lauesen6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Remelius / Richard McLean vs Jeff Lemna / Becky Lemna7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesToni Mountcastle / Thomas Strickler vs Raynard Laylo / Marion Thompson7-5, 6-1
W#1 DoublesValerie Cook / Austin Weisenbeck vs Sue Christianson / Robert Cal7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesStephanie Remelius / Richard McLean vs Kristen Coy / Rick Spurgeon5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Savanelli / Thomas Strickler vs Elisa Zusman / Scott Smith7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesGrace Kuhrt / James Humpherson vs Vitalii Miziuk / Haiying Yuan4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesToni Mountcastle / Thomas Strickler vs Lucie Kreidler / Nick Kouvelis6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesJames Humpherson / Carolyn Humpherson vs Young Choi / Nina Friedman3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJazz Burks / Toni Mountcastle vs Billy Lin / Emily Paris3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAustin Weisenbeck / Valerie Cook vs Mark Ainsworth / Michelle Yeh6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA S Mix 40 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S M40&O7.0X a.MT Bann(OUT) Koliatsis Tues 6:30 $255114410127
2CDTA S M40&O7.0X f.Berens Park(OUT) Barsotti Fri 75114410140
3CDTA S M40&O7.0X c.Tam Lam Tue 7 $225113514130
4CDTA S M40&O7.0X e.Homewood Denne Tue 7 $203381022176
5CDTA S M40&O7.0X b.Score Thompson Thur 7 $202451328200
6CDTA S M40&O7.0X d.Hinsdale Janzen Tue 7 $221531530195
7CDTA S M40&O7.0X g.River Trails Miller Tue 7:30 $220661226172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Grace Kuhrt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Jazz Burks
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.66
Tracy Ries
published 4
3.48
Stephanie Remelius
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.29
James Humpherson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Austin Weisenbeck
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Toni Mountcastle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Carolyn Humpherson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Terri Parse
published 3.5
3.09
Dina Barsotti
published 3.5
Julie Savanelli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Fratella
published
Pauline Tuchscherer
published
Richard McLean
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Tuchscherer
published
Thomas Strickler
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Valerie Cook
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Humpherson + James Humpherson321854% games+10.3% vs expected
Julie Savanelli + Jazz Burks6646% games−1.7% vs expected
Austin Weisenbeck + Valerie Cook23859% gamesnot enough data
Toni Mountcastle + Thomas Strickler71246% gamesnot enough data
Pauline Tuchscherer + Robert Tuchscherer10458% gamesnot enough data
Terri Parse + Thomas Strickler5449% gamesnot enough data
Grace Kuhrt + Thomas Strickler2645% gamesnot enough data
Toni Mountcastle + Jazz Burks4354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Grace Kuhrt
145W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
4.19
4
Jazz Burks
229W–226L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Tracy Ries
82W–49L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Stephanie Remelius
75W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
James Humpherson
42W–24L career · type M · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Austin Weisenbeck
28W–12L career · type M · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Toni Mountcastle
235W–198L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Carolyn Humpherson
75W–47L career · 1 line in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Terri Parse
114W–162L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Dina Barsotti
73W–42L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Julie Savanelli
76W–55L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mark Fratella
22W–61L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pauline Tuchscherer
82W–65L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard McLean
153W–95L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Tuchscherer
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Strickler
151W–206L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Valerie Cook
60W–13L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.