Teams

CDTA S M40&O7.0X e.Homewood Denne Tue 7 $20

CDTA Summer Mixed 40 & Over · CDTA S Mix 40 & Over 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.41 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#2 DoublesCathy Abbott / Gerald Abbott vs Toni Mountcastle / Jazz Burks5-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesShelley Young / Michael Denne vs Emily Lund / Chen Cheng6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGerald Abbott / Cathy Abbott vs Denise Lam / Jason Hui4-6, 2-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle Parks / Marty Weathers vs Julie Hahn / Billy Lin6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesCathy Abbott / Gerald Abbott vs Norbert Glod / Wendy Pochocki6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Huffaker / David Zirkle vs RICHARD FEFFER / Erica White6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Parks / Steve Blaha vs Mick Brennan / Carla Gonzales6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesSteve Blaha / Kathie Melean vs Apple Naughton / Mariusz Cislak1-6, 5-6
W#2 DoublesAdeife Olukolade / Shelley Young vs Vitalii Miziuk / Dimitrina Schoyer7-6, 6-5
W#3 DoublesJennifer Huffaker / Michael Denne vs Nick Kouvelis / Meg Greenberg6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesDavid Zirkle / Jennifer Huffaker vs Derek Majka / Christina Greeley4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathie Melean / Marty Weathers vs Paul Leyderman / Lesa Vidovic5-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesGerald Abbott / Cathy Abbott vs Allycn Grcevic / Michael Roth7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Huffaker / David Zirkle vs Patricia Kladis-Schiappa / Romeen Lavani6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarty Weathers / Shelley Young vs Thomas Johnson / Gina Masciola6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA S Mix 40 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S M40&O7.0X a.MT Bann(OUT) Koliatsis Tues 6:30 $255114410127
2CDTA S M40&O7.0X f.Berens Park(OUT) Barsotti Fri 75114410140
3CDTA S M40&O7.0X c.Tam Lam Tue 7 $225113514130
4CDTA S M40&O7.0X e.Homewood Denne Tue 7 $203381022176
5CDTA S M40&O7.0X b.Score Thompson Thur 7 $202451328200
6CDTA S M40&O7.0X d.Hinsdale Janzen Tue 7 $221531530195
7CDTA S M40&O7.0X g.River Trails Miller Tue 7:30 $220661226172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Angela Anglin Weathers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Jennifer Huffaker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Michael Denne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Marty Weathers
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.36
Gerald Abbott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Steve Blaha
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
David Zirkle
published 3.5
3.25
Kathie Melean
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Tina Dandridge
published 3.5
2.92
Cathy Abbott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Adeife Olukolade
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Michelle Parks
published
Shelley Young
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Dandridge + Michael Denne543556% games+1.3% vs expected
Marty Weathers + Angela Anglin Weathers111549% games−0.2% vs expected
Gerald Abbott + Cathy Abbott71053% gamesnot enough data
Marty Weathers + Jennifer Huffaker4173% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Parks + Steve Blaha314 matchesnot enough data
Marty Weathers + Shelley Young224 matchesnot enough data
Adeife Olukolade + Angela Anglin Weathers314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Huffaker + Steve Blaha224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Anglin Weathers
130W–94L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
3.5
Jennifer Huffaker
113W–70L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Michael Denne
157W–102L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.39
Marty Weathers
92W–83L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Gerald Abbott
43W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Steve Blaha
66W–63L career · type M · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
David Zirkle
2W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Kathie Melean
90W–82L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Tina Dandridge
108W–87L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3
Cathy Abbott
56W–68L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Adeife Olukolade
12W–15L career · type M · 1 line in 2023
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Arnold Villagomez
25W–32L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
2.50
Michelle Parks
22W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shelley Young
67W–40L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.