Teams

Team 9

2022 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.14 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-13vs Team 10 Triple ThreatLost 01
L#2 DoublesLonn Larson / Mary Ann Larson vs Rick Hurwitt / Andrea Hickman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-06vs Team 2 SpoilersLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Han / Kate Donadoni vs Quentin Carter / Kelly Blackborow0-6, 2-6
2022-02-19vs Team 7 MidCourt CrisisLost 02
L#1 DoublesJustin Dorsk / Kate Donadoni vs Soheil Shirzadi / Kim Miller3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNick Mariotti / Jenna Gietl vs Ryan Kim / Malini Sekhar4-6, 3-6
2022-02-13vs Team 8 Aces & EightsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKate Donadoni / Justin Dorsk vs Jira Laprat / Aaron Ohmer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-02-11vs Team 11 Double the FunWon 20
W#1 DoublesKate Donadoni / Jorge Prieto Choy vs Theresa Connolly / Bob White7-5, 5-5
W#2 DoublesJenna Gietl / Duncan Sweny vs Alan Ogilvie / Tracey White2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-01-29vs Team 12Won 10
W#2 DoublesMary Ann Larson / Lonn Larson vs Elisabeth Barrand / Tom Oda6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Jenna Gietl
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.07
3.95
Justin Dorsk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Erin Kaplan
published 4
3.63
Tana Jankowiak
published 4
3.63
Mary Ann Larson
published
3.59
Lonn Larson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Nick Mariotti
published
3.38
Kate Donadoni
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jorge Prieto Choy
published
Lohit Palle
published
Zackery Gould
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jenna Gietl
134W–117L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Gaiell-Mitchell Kercy
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
4.07
4.5
Justin Dorsk
126W–83L career · 2 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
3.95
4
Erin Kaplan
40W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Tana Jankowiak
103W–71L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Mary Ann Larson
10W–16L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Lonn Larson
21W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Nick Mariotti
63W–36L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Kate Donadoni
163W–156L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
Jorge Prieto Choy
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lohit Palle
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Zackery Gould
17W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.