Teams

La.Fye18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-03vs La.Triebert18AWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa House / Liz Broadway vs Lauren Triebert / Griffin Lamb6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLauren Fye / Julianne Rothert vs Kathy Garnier / Kari Barsness6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJacqueline Crutcher vs Anna Jane Franklin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-26vs Je.Komes183.5Split 11
W#2 DoublesAlison Kalinowski / Sara Mazurak vs Amanda Mueller / Jeannette Brown6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Lindsay / Connie Haynes vs Alison Sinclair / Donna Misa3-6, 6-7
2025-04-19vs Er.Wynia18ALost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Fye / Sara Mazurak vs Naomi Rodrigues / Karen Johnston6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Crutcher vs Sydney Chick4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJennifer Anderson / Karen Hepp vs Kendra Allen / Anna Kooper3-6, 5-7
2025-04-12vs Sh.Littleton18AWon 32
L#1 DoublesMelissa House / Liz Broadway vs Katelyn Applegate / Laurel Saunders6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJacqueline Crutcher vs Hilary Tew6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Anderson / Sara Mazurak vs Jamie McCallum / Shannon Littleton6-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesKaren Hepp vs Stephanie Hempstead6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Marriott / Lauren Fye vs Vinaya Verghese / Sarah Soleim6-2, 7-5
2025-03-29vs As.McCollum18ALost 12
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Crutcher vs Shannon Beach3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLiz Broadway / Julianne Rothert vs Janet Hammond / Laura Panebianco1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Hepp / Connie Haynes vs Veronica Glass / Juli Johnson3-6, 4-6
2025-03-22vs Pa.Hankerson18A3.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesLily Li / Liz Broadway vs Stacie White / Natasha Tyson6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLauren Fye / Sara Mazurak vs Ashley McRae / Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMerab Puleo / Julianne Rothert vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-15vs Mo.Sheets18A3.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesLily Li / Sara Mazurak vs Alicia Dare / Brittany Moye3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJacqueline Crutcher vs Stephanie Ferrell3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Fye / Merab Puleo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-01vs De.Lape18AWon 41
W#1 DoublesLiz Broadway / Melissa House vs Daphne Poulk / Sara Velarde6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJacqueline Crutcher vs Suzanne Skelly6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Anderson / Karen Hepp vs Lori Jensen / Andrea Desonglo6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesConnie Haynes vs Holly Santago5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLauren Fye / Kim Peters vs Lisa Dooley / Deanna Lape7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Kim Peters
published
3.58
Lauren Fye
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Julianne Rothert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Sara Mazurak
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.43
Alison Kalinowski
published 3.5
3.40
Jacqueline Crutcher
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.33
Merab Puleo
published
3.29
Elizabeth Marriott
published 3.5
3.28
Karen Hepp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Melissa House
published
3.12
Liz Broadway
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.79
Connie Haynes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Mazurak + Lauren Fye12562% games+6.9% vs expected
Melissa House + Alison Kalinowski2350% games+3.8% vs expected
Connie Haynes + Karen Hepp11263% games+1.7% vs expected
Connie Haynes + Sara Mazurak6457% gamesnot enough data
Connie Haynes + Lauren Fye3253% gamesnot enough data
Melissa House + Jacqueline Crutcher123 matchesnot enough data
Julianne Rothert + Lauren Fye303 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Fye + Karen Hepp213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Peters
23W–22L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Lauren Fye
218W–63L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Julianne Rothert
52W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Sara Mazurak
168W–65L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Alison Kalinowski
27W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Jacqueline Crutcher
44W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.40
Merab Puleo
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Elizabeth Marriott
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Karen Hepp
174W–98L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.28
Melissa House
20W–20L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Liz Broadway
86W–90L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.12
3
Connie Haynes
147W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.