Teams

Carson

2021 Montgomery Adult 55 & Over Spring · Adult 55 & Over Women 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Anne Jagodits
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
4.03
Caridad Coto
published 4.5
3.90
Janette O Logan
published
3.73
Ele Pratt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Cece Finan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Angela Parker
published 4
3.60
Christine Bragale
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Sol Lopez
published
3.49
Stephanie Almeida
published
3.47
Michelle Bryan
published
3.43
Sharon Tennyson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Teresa Wallendjack
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Jagodits + Teresa Wallendjack7352% gamesnot enough data
Anne Jagodits + Cece Finan3263% gamesnot enough data
Anne Jagodits + Sharon Tennyson303 matchesnot enough data
Cece Finan + Christine Bragale213 matchesnot enough data
Janette O Logan + Angela Parker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Jagodits
208W–213L career · 9 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Caridad Coto
1W–14L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
4.03
Janette O Logan
26W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Ele Pratt
102W–79L career · type M · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Cece Finan
67W–78L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Angela Parker
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Christine Bragale
96W–194L career · 5 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
Sol Lopez
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.49
Stephanie Almeida
3W–14L career · no lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
3.49
Michelle Bryan
3W–13L career · no lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Sharon Tennyson
185W–142L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Teresa Wallendjack
63W–89L career · 5 lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.