Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Wright

2023 ITA Mixed 18 & Over · mixed 5.5 18 & over

14 players · average NTRP 2.95 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesPat Williams / Charles Williams vs Chantel Vu / Dylan Richardson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Mangum / LINDSAY MORGAN vs Jeff Petersen / Faleasha Ray3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCandy Friedli / Cody Haroldsen vs Wayne Day / Brianna Rausch0-6, 2-6
2023-09-22vs South Jordan-ChristensenLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Wright / Daniel Mangum vs Wentan Nong / Art Pinon2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStaci Dansie / John Dansie vs Lori Heimuli / Andrew Proudfoot0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCandace Haroldsen / Cody Haroldsen vs Larry Richie / Annie Richie6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCandy Friedli / John Dansie vs Dylan Richardson / Chantel Vu0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPat Williams / Charles Williams vs Taylor Kasteler / James Young5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCody Haroldsen / Ashley Wright vs Wayne Day / Lauren Griswold2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-25vs South Jordan-ChristensenLost 12
W#1 DoublesMorgan Hansen / Manti Hansen vs David Wood / Wentan Nong6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCandace Haroldsen / Cody Haroldsen vs Art Pinon / Lori Heimuli3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLINDSAY MORGAN / Daniel Mangum vs Larry Richie / Annie Richie3-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesManti Hansen / Morgan Hansen vs Taylor Kasteler / James Young6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCandy Friedli / Charles Williams vs Dylan Richardson / Lauren Griswold1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStaci Dansie / John Dansie vs Jeff Petersen / Brianna Rausch0-6, 5-7
2023-08-04vs South Jordan-ChristensenLost 03
L#1 DoublesStaci Dansie / John Dansie vs Karlene Johnston / Mitch Johnston1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCandace Haroldsen / Cody Haroldsen vs Pingjiao Huang / David Wood2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJackie Condie / David Lee vs Wentan Nong / Clark Layton6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesPat Williams / Charles Williams vs Emelia Schinke / Jeff Petersen6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAshley Wright / David Lee vs Lauren Griswold / Dylan Richardson2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesStaci Dansie / John Dansie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-14vs South Jordan-ChristensenWon 20
W#1 DoublesManti Hansen / Morgan Hansen vs Mitch Johnston / Karlene Johnston6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Wright / Brent Higgs vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for mixed 5.5 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Manti Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.16
Cody Haroldsen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.05
Charles Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.99
Candace Haroldsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Ashley Wright
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Daniel Mangum
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Staci Dansie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.42
Pat Williams
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.39
John Dansie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.37
Brent Higgs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jackie Condie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.04
Candy Friedli
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
LINDSAY MORGAN
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Morgan Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Manti Hansen + Morgan Hansen19663% games+18.5% vs expected
Candace Haroldsen + Cody Haroldsen211853% games+0.9% vs expected
John Dansie + Staci Dansie11132% games−10.0% vs expected
Daniel Mangum + LINDSAY MORGAN044 matchesnot enough data
Pat Williams + Charles Williams123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Manti Hansen
124W–51L career · 7 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
3
Cody Haroldsen
59W–61L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.16
3
Charles Williams
9W–17L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Candace Haroldsen
86W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Ashley Wright
53W–112L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Daniel Mangum
9W–14L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.58
3
Staci Dansie
50W–155L career · 4 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49
Pat Williams
20W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.42
John Dansie
2W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
2.39
2.5
Brent Higgs
31W–116L career · 1 line in 2023
0%84%16%
2.37
2.5
Jackie Condie
7W–21L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Candy Friedli
9W–84L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.04
LINDSAY MORGAN
2W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Morgan Hansen
20W–11L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.