Teams

3.0 PTC BattleAxes% W18F

2025 FALL Adult 18&Over PM · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-14vs PHX/Lukes/18&O/3.0WLost 14
L#1 DoublesKathryn Blackwelder / Thara Salamone vs Courtney Skvarla / Julie Aguilar1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesStephanie Voorhees vs Christie Lukes6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKimberley Hoidal / Angee Kane-Fabela vs Andrea Regan / Alicia Ryan3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJennie Elser vs Ashley Carroll1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRenata Miketic / Patricia Mills vs Sharon Cardoza / Rhonda Campbell6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PHX/Lukes/18&O/3.0W102471331376
23.0 STRC WildWestValley W18F93392150463
33.0 PTC Brauer/DeVoto W18F93382253481
43.0 PTC BattleAxes% W18F66322862505
53.0 STRC Black Magic W18F57303067543
63.0 PTC Alley Cats W18F48233778567
73.0 RMC Desert Reign W18F48204085574
83.0 PAS RacketScience W18F1111149100666

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Thara Salamone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Stephanie Voorhees
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.22
Kathryn Blackwelder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Lydia Romero
published
Cindy Stoneman
published 3
2.74
Patricia Mills
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.46
Kimberley Hoidal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Angee Kane-Fabela
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jennie Elser
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Renata Miketic
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Richelle Austin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renata Miketic + Patricia Mills6171% games+19.4% vs expected
Angee Kane-Fabela + Lydia Romero8260% games+12.7% vs expected
Angee Kane-Fabela + Patricia Mills4251% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Voorhees + Patricia Mills404 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Mills + Kathryn Blackwelder224 matchesnot enough data
Angee Kane-Fabela + Richelle Austin123 matchesnot enough data
Angee Kane-Fabela + Renata Miketic213 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Voorhees + Thara Salamone213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thara Salamone
26W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Stephanie Voorhees
32W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
Kathryn Blackwelder
29W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Lydia Romero
61W–42L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Cindy Stoneman
25W–63L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Mills
40W–49L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Kimberley Hoidal
16W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Angee Kane-Fabela
42W–96L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
Jennie Elser
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Renata Miketic
16W–4L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richelle Austin
11W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.