Teams

3.0 RMC Desert Reign W18F

2025 FALL Adult 18&Over PM · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-02vs PHX/Lukes/18&O/3.0WLost 05
L#1 DoublesLysa Clemens / Sophia Harder vs Christie Lukes / Courtney Skvarla2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Harbold vs Andrea Regan4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Grandy Sember / Sharon Knerr vs Julie Aguilar / Sandra Kindred2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJosangely Aular vs Alicia Ryan2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesErin Johnston / Melissa Losasso vs Susan Hatfield / Nadine Sborz2-6, 2-6
2024-11-04vs 3.0 PAS RacketScience W18FWon 32
W#1 DoublesLysa Clemens / Sophia Harder vs Diana Alexander / Eartha Washington6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKatie Harbold vs Kathleen Starkey6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Losasso / Jade Nguyen vs Anakaren Lemus / Janet Wells5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJosangely Aular vs Tara Thornton6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMegan Myers / Erin Johnston vs Vicki Copeland / Nicole Sornsin6-7, 6-7
2024-10-28vs 3.0 STRC WildWestValley W18FLost 23
W#1 DoublesLysa Clemens / Sharon Knerr vs Nicole Heath / Elena Forrestal6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKatie Harbold vs Kenzie Hong1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTerri Lundak / Jade Nguyen vs Samantha Bradford / Valerie Burkhart0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSophia Harder vs Courtney Knight4-6, 1-3
W#3 DoublesKimberly Grandy Sember / Michelle Gaberman vs Niccol Walsh / Ann Guillemette6-1, 7-6
2024-10-24vs PHX/Lukes/18&O/3.0WLost 04
L#1 DoublesMelissa Losasso / Sophia Harder vs Christie Lukes / Alicia Ryan1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Harbold vs Andrea Regan1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTerri Lundak / Josangely Aular vs Julie Aguilar / Rhonda Campbell2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNakia Neves / Erin Johnston vs ANA BENITEZ / Sharon Cardoza3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-09-09vs 3.0 PAS RacketScience W18FWon 32
W#1 DoublesMichelle Gaberman / Lysa Clemens vs Janet Wells / Tara Thornton6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKatie Harbold vs Rhonda Pruitt6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJessica McGinnis / Jade Nguyen vs Phu-My Gep / Nicole Sornsin4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesNakia Neves vs Kathleen Starkey3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Knerr / Erin Johnston vs Vicki Copeland / Erica Harris6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PHX/Lukes/18&O/3.0W102471331376
23.0 STRC WildWestValley W18F93392150463
33.0 PTC Brauer/DeVoto W18F93382253481
43.0 PTC BattleAxes% W18F66322862505
53.0 STRC Black Magic W18F57303067543
63.0 PTC Alley Cats W18F48233778567
73.0 RMC Desert Reign W18F48204085574
83.0 PAS RacketScience W18F1111149100666

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Michelle Gaberman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Josangely Aular
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
2.93
Katie Harbold
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.71
Terri Lundak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Sharon Knerr
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Nakia Neves
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Kimberly Grandy Sember
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Erin Johnston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Melissa Losasso
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Jade Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Sophia Harder
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Lysa Clemens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Myers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jade Nguyen + Michelle Gaberman5352% games+8.0% vs expected
Kimberly Grandy Sember + Michelle Gaberman2348% games+5.2% vs expected
Lysa Clemens + Sophia Harder1638% games−3.1% vs expected
Sharon Knerr + Kimberly Grandy Sember3641% games−12.6% vs expected
Sharon Knerr + Michelle Gaberman3253% gamesnot enough data
Lysa Clemens + Michelle Gaberman224 matchesnot enough data
Jade Nguyen + Megan Myers224 matchesnot enough data
Jade Nguyen + Melissa Losasso224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Gaberman
38W–42L career · 6 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Josangely Aular
31W–23L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Katie Harbold
65W–75L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Terri Lundak
12W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Sharon Knerr
35W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Nakia Neves
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Kimberly Grandy Sember
87W–110L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Erin Johnston
7W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Melissa Losasso
23W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
2.58
Jade Nguyen
28W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Sophia Harder
7W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Lysa Clemens
24W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Myers
19W–26L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.