Teams

3.0 STRC WildWestValley W18F

2025 FALL Adult 18&Over PM · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-04vs PHX/Lukes/18&O/3.0WLost 23
L#1 DoublesNicole Heath / Lorianne Thompson vs Christie Lukes / Courtney Skvarla2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKenzie Hong vs Ashley Carroll1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSamantha Bradford / Pat Cleveland vs Rhonda Campbell / Sharon Cardoza4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCourtney Knight vs Ariel Carr2-6, 5-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAngela Rabb / Valerie Burkhart vs Julie Aguilar / Andrea Regan2-6, 4-6
2024-10-28vs 3.0 RMC Desert Reign W18FWon 32
L#1 DoublesNicole Heath / Elena Forrestal vs Lysa Clemens / Sharon Knerr4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKenzie Hong vs Katie Harbold6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSamantha Bradford / Valerie Burkhart vs Terri Lundak / Jade Nguyen6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCourtney Knight vs Sophia Harder6-4, 3-1
L#3 DoublesNiccol Walsh / Ann Guillemette vs Kimberly Grandy Sember / Michelle Gaberman1-6, 6-7
2024-09-09vs PHX/Lukes/18&O/3.0WWon 41
L#1 DoublesStephanie Garcia-Robertson / Courtney Knight vs Courtney Skvarla / Alicia Ryan5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNicole Rosales vs Ashley Carroll6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLorianne Thompson / Heather Williams vs Sharon Cardoza / Joy Benson6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLeigha Lynch vs ANA BENITEZ6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesValerie Burkhart / Elena Forrestal vs Tandy Beard / Gina Hafner6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PHX/Lukes/18&O/3.0W102471331376
23.0 STRC WildWestValley W18F93392150463
33.0 PTC Brauer/DeVoto W18F93382253481
43.0 PTC BattleAxes% W18F66322862505
53.0 STRC Black Magic W18F57303067543
63.0 PTC Alley Cats W18F48233778567
73.0 RMC Desert Reign W18F48204085574
83.0 PAS RacketScience W18F1111149100666

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Stephanie Garcia-Robertson
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.23
Kenzie Hong
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.23
Nicole Rosales
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.06
Valerie Burkhart
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Angela Rabb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Heather Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Pat Cleveland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Nicole Heath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Ann Guillemette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Courtney Knight
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Leigha Lynch
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.33
Patricia Blaisdell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.31
Niccol Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elena Forrestal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lorianne Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Samantha Bradford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Burkhart + Stephanie Garcia-Robertson4175% games+21.2% vs expected
Nicole Heath + Angela Rabb6261% games+10.0% vs expected
Niccol Walsh + Patricia Blaisdell3539% games+3.3% vs expected
Pat Cleveland + Ann Guillemette5353% games+1.2% vs expected
Nicole Heath + Nicole Rosales3252% gamesnot enough data
Pat Cleveland + Samantha Bradford213 matchesnot enough data
Ann Guillemette + Niccol Walsh123 matchesnot enough data
Niccol Walsh + Angela Rabb213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Garcia-Robertson
13W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Kenzie Hong
25W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Nicole Rosales
30W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
Valerie Burkhart
58W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3.5
Angela Rabb
46W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Heather Williams
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Pat Cleveland
97W–90L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Nicole Heath
78W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Ann Guillemette
40W–56L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Courtney Knight
29W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Leigha Lynch
17W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Patricia Blaisdell
31W–43L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Niccol Walsh
16W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.31
Elena Forrestal
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lorianne Thompson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samantha Bradford
21W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.