Teams

3.0 PTC Alley Cats W18F

2025 FALL Adult 18&Over PM · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.12 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-18vs PHX/Lukes/18&O/3.0WWon 32
W#1 DoublesAmy Adkins / Laura Cunningham vs Courtney Skvarla / Julie Aguilar6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLucia Lipari vs Susan Hatfield6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVictoria Stockton / Emily Blum vs Alicia Ryan / Sharon Cardoza3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCarly Kraai vs Andrea Regan6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesEmma Lauer / Jill Hicks vs Ariel Carr / Ashley Carroll0-6, 1-6
2024-09-16vs PHX/Lukes/18&O/3.0WLost 05
L#1 DoublesTaylor Allmon / Alexandra Hodges vs Christie Lukes / Courtney Skvarla2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLucia Lipari vs Andrea Regan6-7, 5-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Hicks / Victoria Stockton vs Rhonda Campbell / Joy Benson3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesVianka Villa vs Ashley Carroll1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Haskell / Sammi Lee vs ANA BENITEZ / Sharon Cardoza4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PHX/Lukes/18&O/3.0W102471331376
23.0 STRC WildWestValley W18F93392150463
33.0 PTC Brauer/DeVoto W18F93382253481
43.0 PTC BattleAxes% W18F66322862505
53.0 STRC Black Magic W18F57303067543
63.0 PTC Alley Cats W18F48233778567
73.0 RMC Desert Reign W18F48204085574
83.0 PAS RacketScience W18F1111149100666

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carly Kraai
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Lucia Lipari
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.12
Taylor Allmon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Emily Blum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Alexandra Hodges
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Allison Fonte
published 3
2.66
Amy Adkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Victoria Stockton
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.29
Emma Lauer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Sammi Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Heidi Maxwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Donna Haskell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kristin Watson
published
Mansi Sarihan
published
Marianne Banales
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Vianka Villa
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Maxwell + Marianne Banales2536% games−3.7% vs expected
Kaitlin Stephens-Rich + Vianka Villa2542% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Stockton + Jill Hicks044 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Maxwell + Donna Haskell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carly Kraai
32W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lucia Lipari
27W–25L career · 10 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Taylor Allmon
21W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
Emily Blum
17W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Alexandra Hodges
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Allison Fonte
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amy Adkins
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Victoria Stockton
38W–68L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%47%53%
2.51
Emma Lauer
6W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
Sammi Lee
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Heidi Maxwell
5W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Donna Haskell
2W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jill Hicks
12W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kaitlin Stephens-Rich
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Watson
7W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mansi Sarihan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marianne Banales
7W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vianka Villa
4W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.