Teams

Westwood Anthony

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-15vs SCC CacciottiLost 01
L#1 DoublesLil Racelis / Rose Yuen vs Julie Kearfott / Kristin Kim3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-06-10vs ACAC Callaghan / BartholomewWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaty Holder / Caren Payne vs Jackie Granger / Alicia Zatcoff6-3, 6-3
2022-06-08vs Twin Hickory YuSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCaren Payne / Kelly Berry vs Corinne Skevington / Jennifer Schwarz4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRose Yuen / Lil Racelis vs Lisa Frazier / Cathy Parker6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-03vs Raintree MartinWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Berry / Caren Payne vs Ruth Berens / Bridget Westhoven6-4, 6-2
2022-06-01Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLil Racelis / Rose Yuen vs Suzanne Williams / Pamela McGhee1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-05-23vs HCC StinsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesRose Yuen / Lil Racelis vs Beth Stinson / Amery Whitby2-6, 3-6
2022-05-20vs SCC CacciottiLost 01
L#2 DoublesHolley Nilson / Lil Racelis vs Cheryl Cacciotti / Julie Kearfott4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Katy Holder
published
3.44
Jordan Harper
published
Holley Nilson
published 3.5
3.25
Holly Martin
published 3.5
3.24
Becky Anthony
published 3.5
3.23
Julie Farney
published
3.22
Lil Racelis
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.17
Jessica van Tuyle
published
3.16
Rose Yuen
published
3.13
Meredith Schwartz
published
3.13
Kelly Berry
published
2.99
Caren Payne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica van Tuyle + Julie Farney5452% games+6.5% vs expected
Rose Yuen + Lil Racelis3347% games−7.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katy Holder
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
Jordan Harper
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Holley Nilson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Holly Martin
17W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Becky Anthony
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Julie Farney
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Lil Racelis
116W–94L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Jessica van Tuyle
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Rose Yuen
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Meredith Schwartz
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Kelly Berry
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Caren Payne
111W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.