Teams

Mood Swings

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - POCATELLO · Women 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-28vs Spin SistersLost 13
L#1 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Allyson Laible vs Melissa Brake / Kim Hickey7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKaren Dickerson vs Melissa Suru6-1
L#2 DoublesVictoria Scharp / Amy Cunningham vs Sarah Davids / Lyndsi Whitworth3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPanayota Semons-Short / Michele Surmelis vs Allishia Sanford / Heather Farnsworth2-6, 2-6
2025-07-21vs Our AdWon 40
W#1 DoublesRobbie Spicer / Allyson Laible vs Diane Poole / Anita Gibson7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKirsten Nickisch vs Emily Smith1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Cunningham / Victoria Scharp vs Grace Jory / Amanda Frost6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPanayota Semons-Short / Michele Surmelis vs Carri Wullner / Amy Spicer7-6, 7-5
2025-07-09vs Spin SistersLost 13
L#1 DoublesAllyson Laible / Cindy Hansen vs Wendy Elison / Quincy Sutton7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKirsten Nickisch vs Melissa Suru7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Michele Surmelis vs Heather McGeehan / Sarah Davids7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Dickerson / Victoria Scharp vs Melissa Brake / Cara Sonnemann0-6, 1-6
2025-07-02vs Our AdWon 31
W#1 DoublesCindy Hansen / Allyson Laible vs Grace Jory / Annie Goode6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKirsten Nickisch vs Annie Thomas6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Amy Cunningham vs Diane Poole / Anita Gibson6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPanayota Semons-Short / Michele Surmelis vs Lyn McArthur / Amanda Frost6-1, 6-3
2025-06-30vs Spin SistersLost 04
L#1 DoublesRobbie Spicer / Allyson Laible vs Rachel Mattson / Lyndsi Whitworth7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKaren Dickerson vs Melissa Suru0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Michele Surmelis vs Heather McGeehan / Allishia Sanford4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Hansen / Amy Cunningham vs Quincy Sutton / Wendy Elison1-6, 3-6
2025-06-23vs Our AdWon 40
W#1 DoublesRobbie Spicer / Allyson Laible vs Diane Poole / Carri Wullner6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesVenita Petti vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Carrie Rose Lindley vs Amanda Frost / Emily Smith6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesVictoria Scharp / Karen Dickerson vs Amy Spicer / Annie Thomas7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Teresa Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Allyson Laible
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cindy Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Amy Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Robbie Spicer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Michele Surmelis
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.02
Carrie Rose Lindley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Karen Dickerson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.86
Kirsten Nickisch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.78
Panayota Semons-Short
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Victoria Scharp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Venita Petti
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Venita Petti + Carrie Rose Lindley7453% games−0.8% vs expected
Michele Surmelis + Panayota Semons-Short171449% games−2.0% vs expected
Michele Surmelis + Carrie Rose Lindley3839% games−5.1% vs expected
Victoria Scharp + Venita Petti3442% games−6.9% vs expected
Robbie Spicer + Amy Cunningham1536% games−14.7% vs expected
Michele Surmelis + Victoria Scharp4457% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Henderson + Carrie Rose Lindley3259% gamesnot enough data
Robbie Spicer + Allyson Laible314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Teresa Henderson
127W–103L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Allyson Laible
15W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Cindy Hansen
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Amy Cunningham
48W–122L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Robbie Spicer
33W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Michele Surmelis
238W–161L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Carrie Rose Lindley
49W–62L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3.5
Karen Dickerson
66W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Kirsten Nickisch
98W–140L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Panayota Semons-Short
104W–117L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Victoria Scharp
101W–160L career · 8 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Venita Petti
81W–116L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.