Teams

NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Naus/Bloomquist

2023 NWO Mixed 40 & Over · NWO Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-02-18vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Jacobs SVCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Allen / Patricia Naus vs Roger Girts / Amy Graff7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVinh To / Jessica Gralak vs Mike Lyon / Noline Srougi6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDario Sagastume / Lisa Baer-Dewhirst vs Jordan Rofkar / Tina Reinbolt6-4, 7-6
2023-02-05vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Berk -SVCWon 21
W#1 DoublesVinh To / Lisa Baer-Dewhirst vs Mike Tietje / Kelly Riordan6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJason Naus / Christina Tam vs Brad Walbolt / Ann Marie Rachwal3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJames Allen / Debra Bloomquist vs Luke King / Lara Burkett6-7, 3-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesPatricia Naus / Michael Barnett vs Mike O'Reilly / Shawna Dippman1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVinh To / Jessica Gralak vs Steven Eilert / Emily Yavorsky2-6, 5-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Judis / Rachel Barnett vs William Connelly Jr / Jennifer Zinz2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesDario Sagastume / Lisa Baer-Dewhirst vs Brice Starner / Belinda Mermer6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoey Martin / Jessica Gralak vs Andrew Janes / Laurie Long1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Barnett / Patricia Naus vs Elizabeth Moulton / Mike Kapuscinski6-4, 6-2
2023-01-15vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Traver-PTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJason Naus / Christina Tam vs Jill Feltner / Allen Gallant4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Barnett / Michael Barnett vs Rod Bowe / Mary Jo French6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Naus / Jeffrey Judis vs Ani Gonzales / Paul Traver6-1, 5-2
W#1 DoublesMichael Barnett / Rachel Barnett vs Kristopher Keating / Hallie Williams6-1, 5-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoey Martin / Jessica Gralak vs Jason Lewinski / Tracy Tyo7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Judis / Debra Bloomquist vs Greg Davis / Theresa Vietmeier6-4, 0-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NWO Mixed 40 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed O'Reilly/Zinz - TWOS60171381
2NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Naus/Bloomquist5112617155
3NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Traver-PTC4214412136
4NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Jacobs SVC3371124166
5NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Kapuscinski-SVC1551328184
6NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Davis/Stiles-Twos1541430188
7NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Berk -SVC1541430194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Dario Sagastume
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Joey Martin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Christina Tam
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
James Allen
published 3.5
2.84
Lisa Baer-Dewhirst
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.79
Debra Bloomquist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Jessica Gralak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Jason Naus
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Jeffrey Judis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Barnett
published
Patricia Naus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
Rachel Barnett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Vinh To
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Judis + Debra Bloomquist5455% games−0.4% vs expected
Christina Tam + Jason Naus61145% games−3.3% vs expected
Dario Sagastume + Jessica Gralak4350% gamesnot enough data
Vinh To + Christina Tam4255% gamesnot enough data
Vinh To + Jessica Gralak4158% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Baer-Dewhirst + Jason Naus314 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Naus + Jason Naus404 matchesnot enough data
Joey Martin + Jessica Gralak224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dario Sagastume
158W–68L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Joey Martin
126W–109L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Christina Tam
109W–91L career · 7 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
James Allen
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Baer-Dewhirst
64W–76L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Debra Bloomquist
74W–70L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
Jessica Gralak
109W–125L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Jason Naus
87W–113L career · 5 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.56
Jeffrey Judis
102W–34L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Barnett
28W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
0
Patricia Naus
233W–89L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Barnett
71W–47L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Vinh To
37W–16L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.