Teams

NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Kapuscinski-SVC

2023 NWO Mixed 40 & Over · NWO Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.61 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-02-12vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Traver-PTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesChahnaz Almadfae Haidar / Darin Freeman vs Jill Feltner / Allen Gallant1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrice Starner / Laurie Long vs Paul Traver / Rachael McEwen3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAdrienne Pilewski / Jeff Renner vs Ani Gonzales / Rod Bowe4-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesDarin Freeman / Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar vs Andy Rodriguez / Drew Stiles6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Janes / Belinda Mermer vs Kristopher Keating / Theresa Vietmeier6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMike Kapuscinski / Jill Gauthier vs Jason Lewinski / Tracy Tyo6-2, 6-1
2023-01-29vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Jacobs SVCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJackie Kapuscinski / Darin Freeman vs Denise Sottek / Matthew Haschak4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaurie Long / Brice Starner vs Noline Srougi / Mike Lyon4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAdrienne Pilewski / Jeff Renner vs Amy Graff / Roger Girts4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesBrice Starner / Belinda Mermer vs Dario Sagastume / Lisa Baer-Dewhirst4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Janes / Laurie Long vs Joey Martin / Jessica Gralak6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Moulton / Mike Kapuscinski vs Michael Barnett / Patricia Naus4-6, 2-6
2023-01-15vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Berk -SVCLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrice Starner / Laurie Long vs Brad Walbolt / Susan Bernard6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMike Kapuscinski / Jill Gauthier vs Luke King / Lara Burkett6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJeff Renner / Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar vs Brian Berk / Kelly Riordan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDarin Freeman / Adrienne Pilewski vs Steven Eilert / Emily Yavorsky3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Janes / Belinda Mermer vs Jennifer Zinz / Brian Cromly0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Moulton / Mike Kapuscinski vs Mike O'Reilly / Shawna Dippman2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NWO Mixed 40 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed O'Reilly/Zinz - TWOS60171381
2NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Naus/Bloomquist5112617155
3NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Traver-PTC4214412136
4NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Jacobs SVC3371124166
5NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Kapuscinski-SVC1551328184
6NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Davis/Stiles-Twos1541430188
7NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Berk -SVC1541430194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Andrew Janes
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.83
Jill Gauthier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Brice Starner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Adrienne Pilewski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Elizabeth Moulton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Darin Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Jeff Renner
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.10
Mike Kapuscinski
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Jackie Kapuscinski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Belinda Mermer
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Laurie Long
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Gauthier + Mike Kapuscinski6556% games+11.7% vs expected
Andrew Janes + Belinda Mermer5356% games+4.8% vs expected
Jeff Renner + Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar7455% games+4.5% vs expected
Adrienne Pilewski + Darin Freeman5155% games+1.1% vs expected
Jackie Kapuscinski + Darin Freeman61246% games−0.0% vs expected
Darin Freeman + Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar6250% games−0.1% vs expected
Adrienne Pilewski + Jeff Renner61142% games−17.0% vs expected
Mike Kapuscinski + Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Janes
139W–41L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Jill Gauthier
220W–163L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Brice Starner
22W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar
150W–96L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Adrienne Pilewski
226W–231L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Elizabeth Moulton
22W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Darin Freeman
143W–111L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Jeff Renner
113W–136L career · 5 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Mike Kapuscinski
124W–142L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Jackie Kapuscinski
69W–75L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Belinda Mermer
66W–59L career · 9 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
Laurie Long
12W–19L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.