Teams

NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Jacobs SVC

2023 NWO Mixed 40 & Over · NWO Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesRoger Girts / Amy Graff vs James Allen / Patricia Naus5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMike Lyon / Noline Srougi vs Vinh To / Jessica Gralak3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJordan Rofkar / Tina Reinbolt vs Dario Sagastume / Lisa Baer-Dewhirst4-6, 6-7
2023-02-12vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Berk -SVCWon 21
W#1 DoublesRoger Girts / Nina Rettig vs William Rachwal / Ann Marie Rachwal6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJordan Rofkar / Denise Sottek vs Mike Tietje / Hope Modlin6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Jacobs / Renee Kreft vs Benjamin Bernard / Susan Bernard6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMatthew Haschak / Denise Sottek vs Brian Cromly / Shawna Dippman4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMike Lyon / Noline Srougi vs Steven Eilert / Emily Yavorsky2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Green / Renee Kreft vs Ryo Kitamura / Julie Kreienkamp0-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesDenise Sottek / Matthew Haschak vs Jackie Kapuscinski / Darin Freeman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNoline Srougi / Mike Lyon vs Laurie Long / Brice Starner6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Graff / Roger Girts vs Adrienne Pilewski / Jeff Renner6-4, 6-1
2023-01-22vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Traver-PTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Horn / Kevin Green vs Liz Terwilliger / Eric Stegman3-6, 3-5
L#2 DoublesJames Jacobs / Renee Kreft vs Jill Feltner / Allen Gallant6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNoline Srougi / Jordan Rofkar vs Ani Gonzales / Rod Bowe5-7, 3-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAngela Horn / Kevin Green vs Hallie Williams / Kristopher Keating6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTina Reinbolt / Matthew Haschak vs Drew Stiles / Andy Rodriguez1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNina Rettig / Roger Girts vs Jennifer Morgan / Greg Davis6-3, 5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NWO Mixed 40 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed O'Reilly/Zinz - TWOS60171381
2NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Naus/Bloomquist5112617155
3NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Traver-PTC4214412136
4NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Jacobs SVC3371124166
5NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Kapuscinski-SVC1551328184
6NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Davis/Stiles-Twos1541430188
7NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Berk -SVC1541430194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Jordan Rofkar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Mike Lyon
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.79
Renee Kreft
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Roger Girts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Nina Rettig
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Denise Sottek
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.30
Angela Horn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Matthew Haschak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Amy Graff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Noline Srougi
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published
3.14
James Jacobs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Tina Reinbolt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Noline Srougi + Jordan Rofkar9362% games+13.3% vs expected
Mike Lyon + Angela Horn11167% games+12.7% vs expected
Mike Lyon + Noline Srougi5253% games+4.1% vs expected
Matthew Haschak + Tina Reinbolt5259% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Haschak + Nina Rettig3261% gamesnot enough data
James Jacobs + Nina Rettig2347% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Haschak + Angela Horn314 matchesnot enough data
Mike Lyon + Denise Sottek224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jordan Rofkar
115W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
Mike Lyon
141W–55L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
Renee Kreft
48W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
Roger Girts
104W–96L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.39
Nina Rettig
86W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Denise Sottek
122W–82L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Angela Horn
166W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Matthew Haschak
82W–33L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Amy Graff
83W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Noline Srougi
131W–87L career · 11 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
James Jacobs
135W–50L career · 6 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
Tina Reinbolt
132W–143L career · 8 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.