Teams

ACE KICKERS

2022 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

22 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-24vs Fun TimesLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Allen / Paige Gustavsen vs Leann Gilberg / Angie O'Hara2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-05-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaige Gustavsen / Nancy Raeber vs Terry Hardy / Jennifer Colson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-10vs The Band's BackLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaige Gustavsen / Kara Taggart vs Kerri Porritt / Maryann Moorhead6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesPaige Gustavsen vs Cathy Wood6-2, 7-6
2022-04-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaige Gustavsen / Sondra Power-Thornton vs Monica Reagan / Shannon Lofton2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-04-19vs Shot SistersWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaige Gustavsen / Sondra Power-Thornton vs Dawna Buckingham / Marilyn Parker5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-14vs Over ServedLost 01
L#1 SinglesPaige Gustavsen vs Beth Lassen3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
3.43
Molly Schafer
published 3.5
3.42
Stacey Strong
published 3.5
3.26
Glory Questad
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Stephanie Churchman
published 3.5
3.26
Rebecca Fitzpatrick
published 3.5
3.25
Betsy McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.24
Donna Moussalli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Eileen Ursillo
published 3.5
3.21
Cynthia Copple
published 3.5
3.17
Jennifer Johnson
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.09
Gillian Donahey
published 3
3.06
Emily Allen
published 3.5
3.05
Jennifer Wilson
published
2.99
Suzie Wilson
published
Kara Taggart
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Lauren Noonan
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Melissa Nielsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Raeber
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Paige Gustavsen
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Sheila Bush
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Terri Schwanz
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Wilson + Stephanie Churchman5356% games+11.2% vs expected
Betsy McDonald + Emily Allen121253% games+8.5% vs expected
Cynthia Copple + Suzie Wilson4742% games+8.0% vs expected
Rebecca Fitzpatrick + Molly Schafer1742% games+4.8% vs expected
Stacey Strong + Emily Allen292854% games+2.9% vs expected
Cynthia Copple + Jennifer Wilson3444% games−0.7% vs expected
Rebecca Fitzpatrick + Stephanie Churchman141254% games−1.6% vs expected
Betsy McDonald + Sondra Power-Thornton12459% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sondra Power-Thornton
108W–90L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Molly Schafer
87W–80L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Stacey Strong
64W–62L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Glory Questad
97W–116L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Stephanie Churchman
136W–92L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Rebecca Fitzpatrick
97W–114L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Betsy McDonald
75W–47L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Donna Moussalli
63W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Eileen Ursillo
133W–146L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Cynthia Copple
74W–96L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Jennifer Johnson
58W–96L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3
Gillian Donahey
94W–116L career · no lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.09
3.5
Emily Allen
82W–69L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Jennifer Wilson
85W–66L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Suzie Wilson
81W–178L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
Kara Taggart
32W–46L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lauren Noonan
64W–53L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Nielsen
47W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Raeber
46W–28L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paige Gustavsen
59W–40L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheila Bush
14W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Terri Schwanz
23W–53L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.