Teams

Driscoll 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AM

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 3.5 Women Singles Tues AM

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-15vs Baker 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AMLost 02
L#1 SinglesClaire Driscoll vs Olivia Linthavong2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesHeidi Gingerich vs Rebecca Hartsough3-6, 2-6
2025-07-08vs Baker 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AMLost 12
W#1 SinglesClaire Driscoll vs Melissa Baker7-6, 6-0
L#2 SinglesChristina Mohorn vs Jordan Johnson3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesReeves Rhoten vs Lauren Varkey6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-07-01vs Baker 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AMWon 30
W#1 SinglesClaire Driscoll vs Cheryl Scott3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJulie Dover vs Rebecca Hartsough6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKimberly Salata vs Melissa Baker3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-24vs Baker 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AMLost 12
L#1 SinglesClaire Driscoll vs Ashley Jones0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKimberly Salata vs Olivia Linthavong5-7, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJulie Dover vs Julie Herrick6-1, 6-0
2025-06-17vs Baker 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AMLost 03
L#1 SinglesReeves Rhoten vs Lauren Varkey1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesHeidi Gingerich vs Olivia Linthavong1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesChristina Mohorn vs Cheryl Scott4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-06-10vs Baker 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AMLost 12
L#1 SinglesKimberly Salata vs Ashley Jones0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesClaire Driscoll vs Lauren Varkey2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesHeidi Gingerich vs London Kern6-2, 6-0
2025-06-03vs Baker 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AMLost 12
L#1 SinglesMorgan Qubein vs Leslie Marus2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJulie Dover vs Ashley Jones3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesReeves Rhoten vs Cheryl Scott5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Singles Tues AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Julie Dover
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.61
Morgan Qubein
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.35
Reeves Rhoten
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.33
Christina Mohorn
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Kimberly Salata
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.17
Claire Driscoll
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Heidi Gingerich
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Gingerich + Christina Mohorn3345% games+4.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Dover
41W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Morgan Qubein
22W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.61
Reeves Rhoten
30W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Christina Mohorn
35W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.33
Kimberly Salata
21W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Claire Driscoll
15W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Heidi Gingerich
22W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.