Teams

Vogel/18s/6.5/PAC

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming
Sep 8 6:00 PM
Franco's Athletic Club
Sep 15 6:30 PM
Stone Creek Club and Spa
Sep 22 6:00 PM
Pelican Athletic Club
Sep 29 6:00 PM
Pelican Athletic Club
Oct 6 6:00 PM
North Cypress Fitness
Oct 13 7:30 PM
Pelican Athletic Club
Flight standings6 teams · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Walker/18s/6.5/PAC2051226
2Schroeder/18s/6.5/SC2042449
3Guillet/18s/6.5/COQ1142551
4Caswell/18s/6.5/NC1133749
5Vogel/18s/6.5/PAC0224963
6Scarbrough/18s/6.5/FAC02061273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Alecia Seastrunk
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Dana Gegenheimer
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.85
Kristin Higbee
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
2.78
Beth Almond
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
Jamie Vogel
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Jeanne Woodrick
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Kathie Daigle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Lise Joffrion
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Megan Baum
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Melanie Olinde
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published
Melissa Love
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Peggy Benit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sonia Maltais
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Taylor Roessler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Olinde + Beth Almond134 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Higbee + Lise Joffrion213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alecia Seastrunk
14W–12L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Dana Gegenheimer
6W–19L career · type A · 8 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Kristin Higbee
23W–20L career · 16 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Beth Almond
18W–16L career · 16 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Jamie Vogel
12W–7L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeanne Woodrick
10W–21L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathie Daigle
15W–16L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lise Joffrion
11W–3L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Baum
14W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melanie Olinde
8W–28L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Love
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peggy Benit
8W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sonia Maltais
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Roessler
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.