Teams

Schroeder/18s/6.5/SC

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night

15 players · average NTRP 3.22 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming
Sep 15 6:30 PM
Stone Creek Club and Spa
Sep 22 6:30 PM
Stone Creek Club and Spa
Sep 29 6:30 PM
Stone Creek Club and Spa
Oct 6 6:30 PM
Stone Creek Club and Spa
Oct 13 6:00 PM
Coquille Park and Recreation
Flight standings6 teams · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Walker/18s/6.5/PAC2051226
2Schroeder/18s/6.5/SC2042449
3Guillet/18s/6.5/COQ1142551
4Caswell/18s/6.5/NC1133749
5Vogel/18s/6.5/PAC0224963
6Scarbrough/18s/6.5/FAC02061273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Alysha Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.36
Christine Last
usually #1 Doubles 61%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.35
Christine Vincent
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.19
Cherie Verdigets
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
3.12
Erin Englert
usually #2 Doubles 72%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.93
Alison Beebe
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.84
Amanda Myers
usually #1 Doubles 21%, also #2 Singles 21% · published 3
Caroline Allen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.39
Hope Riccobono
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Kacie Smith
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Kimberly Darr
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
Layne Neitzschman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published
Mallory Skarica
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Molly Newell
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Suzanne Roy
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Darr + Alison Beebe11657% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alysha Schroeder
18W–15L career · type A · 28 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Christine Last
22W–13L career · 23 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Christine Vincent
9W–12L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Cherie Verdigets
18W–13L career · 18 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Erin Englert
30W–21L career · 18 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.12
3
Alison Beebe
64W–33L career · 35 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Amanda Myers
27W–14L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Caroline Allen
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Hope Riccobono
8W–4L career · type S · 12 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.39
Kacie Smith
6W–1L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Darr
53W–29L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data
Layne Neitzschman
18W–8L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mallory Skarica
11W–33L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Molly Newell
7W–3L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suzanne Roy
15W–4L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.