Teams

Walker/18s/6.5/PAC

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming
Sep 8 6:00 PM
North Cypress Fitness
Sep 15 6:00 PM
Franco's Athletic Club
Sep 22 6:00 PM
Pelican Athletic Club
Sep 29 6:30 PM
Stone Creek Club and Spa
Oct 6 6:00 PM
Coquille Park and Recreation
Oct 13 6:00 PM
Pelican Athletic Club
Flight standings6 teams · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Walker/18s/6.5/PAC2051226
2Schroeder/18s/6.5/SC2042449
3Guillet/18s/6.5/COQ1142551
4Caswell/18s/6.5/NC1133749
5Vogel/18s/6.5/PAC0224963
6Scarbrough/18s/6.5/FAC02061273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Abby Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 3.5
3.32
Amber Mata
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.27
Brooke Brown
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 3.5
3.17
Ann Boushie
usually #1 Doubles 49%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3
Elizabeth Guidotti
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
Erin Lorio
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Joelle Cuevas
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Shannon Enk
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Stephanie Songy
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Taylor Bouche
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Songy + Abby Hunt5062% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Songy + Ann Boushie134 matchesnot enough data
Erin Lorio + Abby Hunt404 matchesnot enough data
Erin Lorio + Amber Mata123 matchesnot enough data
Amber Mata + Abby Hunt213 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Brown + Taylor Bouche303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Abby Hunt
36W–9L career · 28 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Amber Mata
19W–29L career · 26 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Brooke Brown
22W–6L career · 18 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Ann Boushie
47W–18L career · 34 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Elizabeth Guidotti
9W–21L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Erin Lorio
22W–17L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joelle Cuevas
26W–29L career · 28 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Enk
45W–27L career · 37 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Songy
17W–22L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Bouche
21W–6L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.