Teams

Caswell/18s/6.5/NC

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 8 6:00 PM
North Cypress Fitness
Sep 15 6:00 PM
North Cypress Fitness
Sep 22 6:30 PM
Stone Creek Club and Spa
Sep 29 6:00 PM
Franco's Athletic Club
Oct 6 6:00 PM
North Cypress Fitness
Oct 13 6:00 PM
Pelican Athletic Club
2026-09-01Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLena Wilson / Tabitha Lobell vs Alecia Seastrunk / Lise Joffrion1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Walker/18s/6.5/PAC2051226
2Schroeder/18s/6.5/SC2042449
3Guillet/18s/6.5/COQ1142551
4Caswell/18s/6.5/NC1133749
5Vogel/18s/6.5/PAC0224963
6Scarbrough/18s/6.5/FAC02061273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Christen Anzalone
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.04
Chantel Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.99
Abi Caswell
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.93
Ariana Petrell-thomas
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
Grace Gambel
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Karen Tracey
usually #1 Doubles 65%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Lena Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mignon Hess
usually #1 Singles 49%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
Tabitha Lobell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Tracey + Chantel Freeman5448% gamesnot enough data
Christen Anzalone + Abi Caswell2635% gamesnot enough data
Abi Caswell + Chantel Freeman5357% gamesnot enough data
Christen Anzalone + Chantel Freeman044 matchesnot enough data
Grace Gambel + Karen Tracey044 matchesnot enough data
Grace Gambel + Abi Caswell033 matchesnot enough data
Karen Tracey + Abi Caswell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christen Anzalone
15W–36L career · 28 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Chantel Freeman
39W–39L career · 39 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Abi Caswell
30W–19L career · 25 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Ariana Petrell-thomas
12W–2L career · type D · 9 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Grace Gambel
7W–20L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Tracey
21W–49L career · 37 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lena Wilson
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mignon Hess
30W–34L career · 32 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tabitha Lobell
14W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.