Teams

CDTA S 18&O 3.5W Tam Hanrahan Tues 7 $22

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WN · WE

21 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesDiane Ramoska / Karen Tompkins vs Karen Hirsch / Sarah Schubert2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSarah O'Connor vs Joanne Lund1-6, 4-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLesley Bantle / Nicole Toft vs Deborah Berlin / Laura Knapp6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAmy Noble vs Monika Thadhani6-0, 6-1
L#1 DoublesLesley Bantle / Nicole Toft vs Cheryl Ingram / Nicole Perso4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesSarah O'Connor vs Michelle Fielder6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJane Peller / Teresa Simchak vs Ying Guo / Diane Thomason4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah Holt / Marell Kowalski vs Jill Werts / Leanne Whitlock6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesNicole Toft / Lesley Bantle vs Jean Sawin / Maria Lourdes Bandelow2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesRobyn Kane vs Annalisa Tsai2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Tompkins / Mary Gutowski-Hazzard vs Denise Richmond / Jill Buckley6-2, 5-6
L#2 SinglesJessica Moyer vs Lyndsay Cavanagh5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSarah O'Connor vs Amy Byrne7-6, 3-2
L#2 DoublesTeresa Simchak / Marell Kowalski vs Maureen Hawkinson / Elaine Pieropan7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJessica Moyer vs Catie Burns1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeborah Holt / Lesley Bantle vs Cindy Mulligan / Nanette Dickinson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrooke Eby vs Sarah Blankenbaker6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Hanrahan / Marell Kowalski vs Julie Hahn / Magdalena Galinska3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesSarah O'Connor vs Svetlana Kanev3-6, 5-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori Lamey / Jessica Moyer vs Paula Grabow Duignan / Catie Hughes6-7, 1-6
2022-06-21Won 10
W#1 SinglesBrooke Eby vs Nicole Watson6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesSarah O'Connor vs Lindsay Goodman6-4, 3-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Urbaniak / Karen Tompkins vs Laura Munitz Johnson / Marina Minkina6-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesBrooke Eby vs Heather Reardon6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMaria Vennewitz / Marell Kowalski vs Tammy Holme / Tracy Meyer6-2, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&O 3.5W McFetridge Lund Sat 3 $2081301535339
2CDTA S 18&O 3.5W MT Chi Brown Sat 1 $2572301535341
3CDTA S 18&O 3.5W MT Bann Christiansen Thurs 6:30 $2572311437320
4CDTA S 18&O 3.5W Tam Hanrahan Tues 7 $2254202554387
5CDTA S 18&O 3.5W LifeSport Linc Greenberg Sun 11 $2445222352392
6CDTA S 18&O 3.5W Centennial Ueda Sat 1 $2045212452397
7CDTA S 18&O 3.5W S Barrington Mulligan Tues 7 $2135172352372
8CDTA S 18&O 3.5W Glenbrook Turdo Tues 6:30 $2526132761403
9CDTA S 18&O 3.5W MT Pal Cappas Sun 1 $2627172859411
10CDTA S 18&O 3.5W Forest View Werts Mon 7 $2127192660425

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Lesley Bantle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.51
Jessica Moyer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
3.34
Sarah O'Connor
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.33
Lucie Kreidler
published 3.5
3.27
SoYoung Grote
published 3.5
3.27
Diane Ramoska
published 3.5
3.21
Michele Canar
published 3.5
3.15
Amy Noble
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Marell Kowalski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Patricia Urbaniak
published 3.5
3.13
Mary Hanrahan
published 3.5
3.11
Meredith Santucci
published 3.5
3.05
Karen Tompkins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Nicole Toft
published 3.5
3.04
Deborah Holt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.76
Teresa Simchak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Jane Peller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Lori Lamey
published 3
2.60
Robyn Kane
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Brooke Eby
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Tompkins + Patricia Urbaniak5447% games+10.5% vs expected
Karen Tompkins + Mary Gutowski-Hazzard5646% games+9.0% vs expected
Lesley Bantle + Nicole Toft241256% games+7.2% vs expected
Lucie Kreidler + SoYoung Grote13756% games+4.6% vs expected
Deborah Holt + Mary Gutowski-Hazzard101043% games+4.1% vs expected
Amy Noble + Jessica Moyer2450% games+4.1% vs expected
Lucie Kreidler + Mary Gutowski-Hazzard4255% games+3.9% vs expected
Mary Gutowski-Hazzard + Jessica Moyer7555% games+1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lesley Bantle
122W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Jessica Moyer
63W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Mary Gutowski-Hazzard
75W–63L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
Sarah O'Connor
44W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Lucie Kreidler
165W–131L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
SoYoung Grote
111W–94L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Diane Ramoska
44W–50L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Michele Canar
37W–67L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Amy Noble
40W–38L career · 1 line in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Marell Kowalski
36W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Patricia Urbaniak
57W–63L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Mary Hanrahan
81W–96L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Meredith Santucci
57W–45L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Karen Tompkins
22W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Nicole Toft
55W–45L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Deborah Holt
58W–85L career · 2 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Teresa Simchak
42W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Jane Peller
27W–64L career · 1 line in 2022
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Lori Lamey
36W–75L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Robyn Kane
21W–72L career · 1 line in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
Brooke Eby
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.