Teams

CDTA S 18&O 3.5W Centennial Ueda Sat 1 $20

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WN · WE

13 players · average NTRP 3.69 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 DoublesDeborah Berlin / Linda Genty vs Cathi Cappas / Stephanie Nieszel4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Chudgar / Monika Thadhani vs Pamela Jackson / Anne Lewis4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMonika Thadhani vs Cheryl Ingram6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDawn Livingston / Nancy Dolan vs CHRISTINE TAN / Beverly Vacval6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDeborah Berlin vs Joanna Cornwell6-3, 7-5
W#1 DoublesKaren Hirsch / Sarah Schubert vs Diane Ramoska / Karen Tompkins6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDeborah Berlin / Laura Knapp vs Lesley Bantle / Nicole Toft2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMonika Thadhani vs Amy Noble0-6, 1-6
2022-07-16Won 10
W#1 SinglesLaura Knapp vs Sherry Polachek6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDeborah Berlin / Amy Chudgar vs Lindsay Goodman / Karen Kooperman4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMegan Crisham / Dawn Livingston vs Laura Munitz Johnson / Heather Reardon6-1, 7-6
W#1 DoublesJoanne Lund / Amy Chudgar vs Magdalena Galinska / Julie Hahn6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLaura Knapp vs Sarah Blankenbaker2-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Genty / Deborah Berlin vs Agnieszka Fijol / Catie Hughes6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAmy Chudgar / Joanne Lund vs Darlene Fuller / Jarmila Singer6-7, 1-4
W#1 SinglesLaura Knapp vs Nanette Dickinson6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDeborah Berlin / Nancy Dolan vs Catie Burns / Tena Bucalo6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesAmy Chudgar / Joanne Lund vs Maria Lourdes Bandelow / Mandy Shaw7-6, 1-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLaura Knapp vs Andrea Grahe4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&O 3.5W McFetridge Lund Sat 3 $2081301535339
2CDTA S 18&O 3.5W MT Chi Brown Sat 1 $2572301535341
3CDTA S 18&O 3.5W MT Bann Christiansen Thurs 6:30 $2572311437320
4CDTA S 18&O 3.5W Tam Hanrahan Tues 7 $2254202554387
5CDTA S 18&O 3.5W LifeSport Linc Greenberg Sun 11 $2445222352392
6CDTA S 18&O 3.5W Centennial Ueda Sat 1 $2045212452397
7CDTA S 18&O 3.5W S Barrington Mulligan Tues 7 $2135172352372
8CDTA S 18&O 3.5W Glenbrook Turdo Tues 6:30 $2526132761403
9CDTA S 18&O 3.5W MT Pal Cappas Sun 1 $2627172859411
10CDTA S 18&O 3.5W Forest View Werts Mon 7 $2127192660425

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Masako Ueda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Joanne Lund
published 4
Amy Chudgar
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.50
Yarina Birnbaum
published 4
3.33
Linda Genty
published 3.5
3.30
Karen Hirsch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Denise Schneider
published 3.5
Dawn Livingston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Megan Crisham
published 3.5
3.13
Nancy Dolan
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.09
Deborah Berlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
2.67
Monika Thadhani
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Laura Knapp
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanne Lund + Amy Chudgar21564% games+14.8% vs expected
Yarina Birnbaum + Joanne Lund18363% games+6.8% vs expected
Deborah Berlin + Karen Hirsch4256% games+5.3% vs expected
Linda Genty + Yarina Birnbaum7655% games+2.9% vs expected
Denise Schneider + Joanne Lund12261% games+2.9% vs expected
Linda Genty + Denise Schneider4255% games+2.6% vs expected
Megan Crisham + Denise Schneider6754% games+0.9% vs expected
Deborah Berlin + Nancy Dolan3743% games−1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Masako Ueda
166W–96L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Joanne Lund
172W–88L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Amy Chudgar
27W–15L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Yarina Birnbaum
72W–67L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Linda Genty
86W–50L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Karen Hirsch
69W–81L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Denise Schneider
101W–70L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Dawn Livingston
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Megan Crisham
138W–161L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Nancy Dolan
69W–88L career · 6 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Deborah Berlin
84W–114L career · 6 lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.09
Monika Thadhani
51W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Laura Knapp
44W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.