Teams

40 Love

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.44 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-05-21vs SharkasmWon 20
W#1 DoublesCathy Adams / Sherry Huber vs Stacey Strong / Nancy Raeber6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKelly Loeb / Deanna McMahon vs Betsy McDonald / Kim Agler7-5, 6-0
2021-05-19vs Ace, Ace, BabyWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarole Wolff / Jill Call vs Holly Friend / Leslie Michael3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Adcox / Julie Eisele vs Hillary Lilya / Teresa Owen6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSherry Huber / Cathy Adams vs Vicki Flume / Diane Norquist6-0, 6-2
2021-05-17vs Volley LlamasWon 20
W#1 SinglesJill Call vs Linda Bloomer6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Schmidlkofer / Deanna McMahon vs Kathne Morrell / Cecelia Larson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-12vs SIMPLY SMASHINGWon 30
W#1 DoublesCathy Adams / Sherry Huber vs Lori Barnum / Jennifer Miller6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJill Call vs Cathy Wood6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Haskell / Julie Eisele vs Ahnna Dudley / Angie Marmillion6-2, 6-1
2021-05-05vs Honey DeuceLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Eisele / Mary Parsons vs Christy Siemons / Deniz Aygen2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-05-03vs GOATSWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeanna McMahon / Kelly Loeb vs Cathy Drake / Suzie Wilson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-28Split 11
L#1 DoublesCathy Adams / Sherry Huber vs Robyn Roby / Rosy Castleton2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJill Call / Carole Wolff vs Teresa McDonald / Kimber Green6-2, 6-1
2021-04-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Loeb / Deanna McMahon vs Janice Peters / Tracy Pham6-3, 6-4
2021-04-21vs RacquettesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSherry Huber / Cathy Adams vs Betty Peterson / Shannon Lofton7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Eisele / Diana Hornung vs Amanda Steele / Nancy Mallory6-3, 6-3
2021-04-18vs Hot FlashesWon 10
W#1 DoublesSherry Huber / Cathy Adams vs Merritt Swartley / Leslie Hughes6-1, 6-1
2021-04-12vs Tough LoveWon 21
W#1 SinglesJill Call vs Jennifer Sukow7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Eisele / Kelly Loeb vs Jennifer Small / Kristen Gray6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDiana Hornung / Janna Tipton vs Shelly Tatistcheff / Rachel Boren3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-04-05vs ETC Smash SistersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJill Call / Deanna McMahon vs Brenda Bourn / Lori Sato7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Eisele / Diana Hornung vs Cheri Nelson / Christina Elder6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Honey Deuce111381028333
240 Love111301839371
3Each Hit10240822317
4Ace, Ace, Baby93361230344
5Racquettes93311739349
6Tough Love75242456452
7Sharkasm57242453446
8Hot Flashes57183067475
9Volley Llamas48153370498
10GOATS39173167473
11Heat Strokes210153370506
12SIMPLY SMASHING111143472505
13ETC Smash Sisters111103881534

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Mary Parsons
published 4
3.42
Dawn Crochet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Cathy Adams
published 3.5
Carole Wolff
published 3.5
Diana Hornung
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Kelly Loeb
published
3.09
Mary Adcox
published 3.5
2.81
2.38
Janna Tipton
published 3
Deanna McMahon
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Jill Call
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Eisele
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kelly Haskell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Sherry Huber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Adcox + Mary Parsons7269% games+8.2% vs expected
Jan Ingelstrom-Stewart + Kelly Loeb3546% games+2.5% vs expected
Mary Adcox + Dawn Crochet4949% games+1.7% vs expected
Jan Ingelstrom-Stewart + Mary Parsons131049% games−1.4% vs expected
Janna Tipton + Diana Hornung161845% games−10.9% vs expected
Cathy Adams + Sherry Huber18855% gamesnot enough data
Mary Adcox + Julie Eisele121453% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Crochet + Kelly Haskell61841% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Parsons
169W–125L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.74
3.5
Dawn Crochet
170W–181L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Cathy Adams
72W–63L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Carole Wolff
12W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Diana Hornung
41W–33L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kelly Loeb
91W–100L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Mary Adcox
151W–195L career · no lines in 2021
23%76%<1%
3.09
3
Jan Ingelstrom-Stewart
62W–73L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Janna Tipton
48W–81L career · no lines in 2021
82%18%<1%
2.38
Deanna McMahon
26W–12L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jill Call
40W–17L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Eisele
47W–53L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kelly Haskell
78W–129L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sherry Huber
69W–36L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.