Teams

Racquettes

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - BOISE · TV

17 players · average NTRP 3.78 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-05-19vs Honey DeuceLost 01
L#3 DoublesRaQuel Montgomery / Angel Marie Bowie vs Judy Baier / Kate MacKay6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-17vs SIMPLY SMASHINGLost 02
L#1 SinglesChristine Cegelski vs Kelsey Stratton7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmanda Steele / Angel Marie Bowie vs Gail Inch / Maureen Sykes5-7, 4-6
2021-05-05vs GOATSWon 21
W#1 SinglesChristine Cegelski vs Eileen Ursillo6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSherri Felton / Dina Bostock vs Gillian Donahey / Suzie Wilson6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAngel Marie Bowie / Amanda Steele vs Melissa Nielsen / Dyan Goulet6-7, 0-6
2021-04-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesVicki Osweiler / Angel Marie Bowie vs Deanna Miller / Tracy Pham6-3, 6-3
2021-04-21vs 40 LoveSplit 11
L#1 SinglesChristine Cegelski vs Mary Parsons3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBetty Peterson / Shannon Lofton vs Sherry Huber / Cathy Adams7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-19vs Ace, Ace, BabyLost 01
L#3 DoublesDina Bostock / Sherri Felton vs Roxy Therrien / Teresa Owen1-1
2021-04-14vs Tough LoveSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSherri Felton vs Jinny Giery6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRochelle Martin / Shannon Lofton vs Shawna Byington / Kristen Gray7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-12vs Hot FlashesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesColette van de Graaff / Shannon Lofton vs ADRA KIPPER / Jill Yost6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAmanda Steele / Angel Marie Bowie vs Rebecca Franson / Gini Rosandick3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-04-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSherri Felton / Dina Bostock vs Tanya Vaughan / Jennifer Wilson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-04-07Lost 01
L#1 SinglesChristine Cegelski vs Maggie Horvat6-1, 0-6, 0-1
2021-04-05vs Volley LlamasLost 01
L#3 DoublesDina Bostock / Sherri Felton vs Sandra Gulley / Karen East3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Honey Deuce111381028333
240 Love111301839371
3Each Hit10240822317
4Ace, Ace, Baby93361230344
5Racquettes93311739349
6Tough Love75242456452
7Sharkasm57242453446
8Hot Flashes57183067475
9Volley Llamas48153370498
10GOATS39173167473
11Heat Strokes210153370506
12SIMPLY SMASHING111143472505
13ETC Smash Sisters111103881534

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
3.73
Kimberly Cowley
published 4
3.59
Christine Elwer
published 4
3.59
3.49
Dina Bostock
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.30
Nancy Mallory
published 3.5
Amanda Steele
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.19
Shannon Lofton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Betty Peterson
published 3.5
3.04
Angel Marie Bowie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Monica Reagan
published
Christine Cegelski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lori van Alfen
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
RaQuel Montgomery
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
Rochelle Martin
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sherri Felton
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Vicki Osweiler
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katheryn Burriesci + Kimberly Cowley7650% games+9.1% vs expected
Nancy Mallory + Katheryn Burriesci6450% games+0.5% vs expected
Christine Elwer + Katheryn Burriesci15458% games−0.2% vs expected
Kimberly Cowley + Colette van de Graaff7553% games−2.7% vs expected
Kimberly Cowley + Lori van Alfen503254% gamesnot enough data
Vicki Osweiler + Angel Marie Bowie121349% gamesnot enough data
Katheryn Burriesci + RaQuel Montgomery101252% gamesnot enough data
Dina Bostock + Sherri Felton61047% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Colette van de Graaff
74W–48L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Kimberly Cowley
140W–95L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Christine Elwer
156W–133L career · no lines in 2021
23%76%<1%
3.59
4
Katheryn Burriesci
108W–95L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Dina Bostock
42W–54L career · 4 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Nancy Mallory
189W–137L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Amanda Steele
65W–129L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Shannon Lofton
34W–38L career · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Betty Peterson
257W–369L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Angel Marie Bowie
61W–93L career · 5 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.04
Monica Reagan
106W–95L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.03
Christine Cegelski
25W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lori van Alfen
51W–35L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data
RaQuel Montgomery
44W–20L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rochelle Martin
13W–14L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sherri Felton
46W–68L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Vicki Osweiler
53W–66L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.