Teams

Sharkasm

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - BOISE · TV

16 players · average NTRP 3.46 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-21vs 40 LoveLost 01
L#3 DoublesBetsy McDonald / Kim Agler vs Kelly Loeb / Deanna McMahon5-7, 0-6
2021-05-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChrista Napier / Betsy McDonald vs Tracy Pham / Molly Henrie6-7, 6-7
2021-04-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMolly Schafer / Betsy McDonald vs Gini Rosandick / Leslie Hughes7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2021-04-21vs Volley LlamasLost 01
L#2 DoublesBetsy McDonald / Christa Napier vs Kit Herndon / Tracey Laursen-Idoeta3-6, 5-7
2021-04-12vs Honey DeuceLost 01
L#2 DoublesBetsy McDonald / Cynthia Copple vs Judy Baier / Lisa della Badia2-6, 0-6
2021-04-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBetsy McDonald / Rebecca Fitzpatrick vs Monica Reagan / Colette van de Graaff3-6, 4-6
2021-04-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Allen / Betsy McDonald vs Robyn Roby / Rosy Castleton3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Honey Deuce111381028333
240 Love111301839371
3Each Hit10240822317
4Ace, Ace, Baby93361230344
5Racquettes93311739349
6Tough Love75242456452
7Sharkasm57242453446
8Hot Flashes57183067475
9Volley Llamas48153370498
10GOATS39173167473
11Heat Strokes210153370506
12SIMPLY SMASHING111143472505
13ETC Smash Sisters111103881534

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Tanya Vaughan
published 4
3.43
Molly Schafer
published 3.5
3.42
Stacey Strong
published 3.5
3.26
Stephanie Churchman
published 3.5
3.26
Rebecca Fitzpatrick
published 3.5
3.25
Betsy McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.21
Cynthia Copple
published 3.5
3.17
Jennifer Johnson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Lora Bonser
published 3.5
3.10
Lori Hosac
published 3.5
3.06
Emily Allen
published 3.5
3.05
Jennifer Wilson
published
2.95
Kim Agler
published 3
2.74
Christa Napier
published 3
Nancy Raeber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sheila Bush
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Wilson + Stephanie Churchman5356% games+11.2% vs expected
Lori Hosac + Stephanie Churchman11359% games+9.4% vs expected
Betsy McDonald + Emily Allen121253% games+8.5% vs expected
Rebecca Fitzpatrick + Molly Schafer1742% games+4.8% vs expected
Stacey Strong + Emily Allen292854% games+2.9% vs expected
Tanya Vaughan + Jennifer Wilson2643% games+0.5% vs expected
Cynthia Copple + Jennifer Wilson3444% games−0.7% vs expected
Rebecca Fitzpatrick + Stephanie Churchman141254% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tanya Vaughan
148W–143L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Molly Schafer
87W–80L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Stacey Strong
64W–62L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Stephanie Churchman
136W–92L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Rebecca Fitzpatrick
97W–114L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Betsy McDonald
75W–47L career · 7 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Cynthia Copple
74W–96L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Jennifer Johnson
58W–96L career · 12 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Lora Bonser
117W–110L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Lori Hosac
101W–89L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Emily Allen
82W–69L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
Jennifer Wilson
85W–66L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Kim Agler
89W–82L career · no lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Christa Napier
81W–65L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
Nancy Raeber
46W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sheila Bush
14W–48L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.