Teams

Each Hit

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.69 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-18vs Ace, Ace, BabyWon 10
W#3 DoublesBarbara Beagles / Kimberly Clifford vs Roxy Therrien / Shawna Ianson6-2, 6-0
2021-05-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesAdrianne Fisher / Barbara Beagles vs Heidi Hawkins / Kathy Hansen6-2, 6-2
2021-04-21vs Tough LoveWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara Beagles / Teresa McDonald vs Stacie Hildebrandt / Debbie Merritt7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2021-04-19vs Hot FlashesWon 10
W#3 DoublesBarbara Beagles / Adrianne Fisher vs Ginger Cummins / Jill Yost6-2, 6-0
2021-04-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesAdrianne Fisher / Barbara Beagles vs Cheri Nelson / Sheri Wippel6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Honey Deuce111381028333
240 Love111301839371
3Each Hit10240822317
4Ace, Ace, Baby93361230344
5Racquettes93311739349
6Tough Love75242456452
7Sharkasm57242453446
8Hot Flashes57183067475
9Volley Llamas48153370498
10GOATS39173167473
11Heat Strokes210153370506
12SIMPLY SMASHING111143472505
13ETC Smash Sisters111103881534

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Robyn Roby
published 4
3.59
3.58
Mary Burke
published 4
3.57
Heidi Stipp
published 4
3.39
Zel Mertz
published 3.5
3.36
Kimberlee Megale
published 3.5
3.23
Marnie Newton
published 3.5
3.23
Adrianne Fisher
published 3.5
3.20
Patty Jackson
published 3.5
3.17
Elaine Remley
published 3.5
3.16
Barbara Beagles
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
Teresa McDonald
published 3.5
3.00
Rosy Castleton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Stipp + Kimberlee Megale9163% games+6.7% vs expected
Marnie Newton + Zel Mertz5361% games+5.2% vs expected
Zel Mertz + Jennifer Mitchell351459% games+4.3% vs expected
Mary Burke + Elaine Remley211057% games+0.8% vs expected
Kimberlee Megale + Teresa McDonald9852% games−5.0% vs expected
Barbara Beagles + Heidi Stipp241057% gamesnot enough data
Rosy Castleton + Robyn Roby24667% gamesnot enough data
Adrianne Fisher + Marnie Newton8455% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Robyn Roby
394W–189L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Kimberly Clifford
142W–113L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Mary Burke
151W–103L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Heidi Stipp
166W–109L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Zel Mertz
335W–191L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Kimberlee Megale
183W–106L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Marnie Newton
214W–184L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Adrianne Fisher
85W–73L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Patty Jackson
93W–84L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Elaine Remley
56W–51L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.17
3.5
Barbara Beagles
77W–75L career · 5 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Teresa McDonald
153W–152L career · no lines in 2021
23%76%<1%
3.09
4
Jennifer Mitchell
164W–142L career · no lines in 2021
>99%<1%<1%
3.00
Rosy Castleton
98W–31L career · 14 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.