Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/Platis

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#3 DoublesRebecca Bratlien / Teresa Makhijani vs Betsy Henningsen / Andrea Primer2-6, 0-6
2024-02-05vs CV-Deep Canyon/B StoneLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ruddell / Nancy Whittaker vs Lorraine Booth / Darlene Dagan4-6, 2-6
2024-01-29vs CV-Indian Wells TG/NickersonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ruddell / Andrea Howland - Cobb vs Elizabeth Duff / Monica Solis6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-01-15vs CV-Rancho La Quinta /N AndersonLost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca Bratlien / Beth Nini Hillebrand vs Andrea Holmes / Susan Haley2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKarin Barnes / Jennifer Ruddell vs Jill Day / Elaine Reddick-Cooley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBecky Jones / Teresa Makhijani vs Janice Creager / Stacie Hogan6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Rebecca Bratlien
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Marti Jablon
published
3.28
3.27
Debbie Fuggetta
published 3.5
Alethea Platis
published 3.5
3.24
Nancy Whittaker
published
3.22
Lori Tanking
published
3.16
Becky Jones
published 3.5
3.08
Jennifer Ruddell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Janneche Nevin
published
Meg Zoretic
published
Tammy Roach
published
Teresa Makhijani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Theresa McMillan
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Bratlien
35W–68L career · 2 lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
3.40
Marti Jablon
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
3.37
3.5
Andrea Howland - Cobb
21W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Debbie Fuggetta
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Alethea Platis
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Whittaker
21W–33L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Lori Tanking
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Becky Jones
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.16
Jennifer Ruddell
17W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
Janneche Nevin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meg Zoretic
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tammy Roach
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Teresa Makhijani
19W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Theresa McMillan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.