Teams

CV-LLW-Palm Springs TC/Caruso & S Hope

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2024-03-25vs CV-Indian Wells TG/NickersonWon 30
W#1 DoublesSue Cannon / Staci Munic vs Elizabeth Duff / Monica Harrington7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLorene Peirce / Karen Meyer vs Kathy Buller / Kathy McArthur7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLindy Gaylord / Deborah Lands vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Hope / Betsy Henningsen vs Janet Dewar / Betty Matsumoto7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesBetsy Henningsen / Staci Munic vs Andrea Holmes / Jane Engles6-2, 6-0
2024-02-26vs CV-Indian Wells TG/PlatisWon 20
W#2 DoublesSusan Hope / Kathy Rogers vs Andrea Howland - Cobb / Alethea Platis6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBetsy Henningsen / Andrea Primer vs Rebecca Bratlien / Teresa Makhijani6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesKathy Rogers / Susan Hope vs Patricia Baughman / Barbara Holmsten6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLindy Gaylord / Merri Wells vs Lesley Pittman / Wanda Ramos3-6, 4-6
2024-02-13vs CV-Sun City Palm Desert/GrovesLost 01
L#3 DoublesBetsy Henningsen / Andrea Primer vs Lori Greenman / Lynne Prince2-6, 1-6
2024-02-12vs CV-Mission Hills/MoskowitzSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSue Cannon / Susan Hope vs Susan Sheridan / Shelley Lynch4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Caruso / Lorene Peirce vs Linda Moskowitz / Denise Roethenmund6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLorene Peirce / Kathy Rogers vs Nancy Jacoby / Denise Stumpf6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBetsy Henningsen / Andrea Primer vs Paula Buononato / Faith Zelenko6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLindy Gaylord / Merri Wells vs Susan Burns / Molly Hilll6-1, 6-4
2024-01-15vs CV-Indian Ridge CC/S MorinWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Caruso / Kathy Rogers vs Mary Czerwinski / Nancy Nolan6-1, 6-1
2024-01-08vs CV-Deep Canyon/B StoneWon 20
W#2 DoublesStaci Munic / Kathy Rogers vs Becky Holtzinger / Blair Stone2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Meyer / Lorene Peirce vs Loretta Gohd / Deborah Rogers6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Merri Wells
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Kathy Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.51
Celeste Manolas
published 3.5
3.50
Sue Cannon
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Betsy Henningsen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Andrea Primer
published 3.5
3.40
Doris Hoffmann
published
3.32
Maribeth Pullman
published
3.31
Deborah Lands
published 3.5
3.29
Maria Himelman
published
3.15
Lindy Gaylord
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lorene Peirce
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Staci Munic
published
Susan Caruso
published
Susan Hope
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Rogers + Susan Hope5360% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Rogers + Susan Caruso4446% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Rogers + Lorene Peirce224 matchesnot enough data
Lorene Peirce + Lindy Gaylord404 matchesnot enough data
Lorene Peirce + Betsy Henningsen303 matchesnot enough data
Merri Wells + Lindy Gaylord213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Merri Wells
70W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.64
3.5
Kathy Rogers
108W–60L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Celeste Manolas
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
Sue Cannon
99W–81L career · 6 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Betsy Henningsen
45W–23L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Andrea Primer
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Doris Hoffmann
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Maribeth Pullman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Deborah Lands
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Maria Himelman
14W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Lindy Gaylord
68W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.15
Lorene Peirce
45W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Staci Munic
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Caruso
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Hope
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.