Teams

CV-Indian Ridge CC/S Morin

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2024-03-29vs CV-Rancho La Quinta /N AndersonWon 21
L#1 DoublesPamela Olson / Ann Morford vs Rachel Clark / Nancy Anderson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Czerwinski / Barbara Johns vs Jill Day / Jane Engles6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTheresa Peek / Shelly Enstrom vs Elaine Reddick-Cooley / Janice Creager6-3, 7-5
L#1 DoublesAnn Morford / Pamela Olson vs Carla Stanford / Sandra Comerchero3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Huey / Shelly Enstrom vs Barbara Shelley / Kate Allard6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBarbara Johns / Mary Czerwinski vs Suzanne Mann / Arian Balkan6-3, 7-5
2024-03-04vs CV-Indian Wells TG/NickersonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Czerwinski / Ann Morford vs Nicole Popper / Kathy McArthur6-4, 6-0
L#1 DoublesAnn Morford / Mary Czerwinski vs Mary Fox / Barbara Holmsten3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Huey / Susan D Morin vs Carol Cornell / Patricia Baughman3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Eagleton / Roberta Dierks vs Wanda Ramos / Carolyn Wright3-6, 3-6
2024-02-20vs CV-Sun City Palm Desert/GrovesWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan D Morin / Elizabeth Huey vs Terri Johnson / Linda Johnson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPamela Olson / Ann Morford vs Patricia Taylor / Betsy Blackall6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMary Czerwinski / Roberta Dierks vs Patti Groves / Ann Oswald6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-02-19vs CV-Deep Canyon/B StoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Czerwinski / Ann Morford vs Francine Legault / Susan Sacks6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-02-12vs CV-Indian Wells TG/PlatisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Huey / Susan D Morin vs Lori Tanking / Marti Jablon7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNancy Nolan / Karen Eagleton vs Meg Zoretic / Tammy Roach1-6, 2-6
2024-02-05vs CV-Palm Desert TC/StolikerLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Huey / Barbara Johns vs Myriam Wunder / Betty Matsumoto6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Morford / Pamela Olson vs Judy Sacha / Judy Warner6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Eagleton / Shelly Enstrom vs Barb Stoliker / Gayle Pinkard3-6, 2-6
2024-01-29vs CV-Mission Hills/MoskowitzSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBarbara Johns / Karen Eagleton vs Denise Roethenmund / Molly Woods6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Kratzig / Shelly Enstrom vs Rebecca Ringer / Ellen Boyer3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Huey / Barbara Johns vs Deborah Lands / Celeste Manolas1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Czerwinski / Nancy Nolan vs Susan Caruso / Kathy Rogers1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesBarbara Johns / Elizabeth Huey vs Abby Grant / Kristal Wilson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Czerwinski / Shelly Enstrom vs Melanie Ditton / Diane Macdonald3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Kratzig / Karen Eagleton vs Susan Burns / Donna Simpson4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Susan D Morin
published
3.40
Elizabeth Huey
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.18
Karen Eagleton
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Ann Morford
published 3.5
3.09
Barbara Johns
published 3.5
2.98
Pamela Olson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.90
Shelly Enstrom
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Mary Czerwinski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Roberta Dierks
published
Julie Kratzig
published
Nancy Nolan
published
Theresa Peek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly Enstrom + Mary Czerwinski21043% games−2.9% vs expected
Pamela Olson + Mary Czerwinski7268% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Huey + Karen Eagleton6163% gamesnot enough data
Shelly Enstrom + Pamela Olson3351% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Huey + Susan D Morin4159% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Olson + Ann Morford033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan D Morin
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
Elizabeth Huey
31W–18L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Karen Eagleton
154W–121L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Ann Morford
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Barbara Johns
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Pamela Olson
65W–40L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%56%43%
2.98
3
Shelly Enstrom
92W–93L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Mary Czerwinski
79W–96L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Roberta Dierks
14W–33L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
Julie Kratzig
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Nolan
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Theresa Peek
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.